Lune

EMNLP Findings2024

Detecting Machine-Generated Long-Form Content with Latent-Space Variables

Yufei Tian, Zeyu Pan, Nanyun Peng

Abstract

The increasing capability of large language models (LLMs) to generate fluent long-form texts is presenting new challenges in distinguishing machine-generated outputs from human-written ones, which is crucial for ensuring authenticity and trustworthiness of expressions. Existing zero-shot detectors primarily focused on token-level distributions, which are vulnerable to real-world domain shifts including different prompting and decoding strategies, and adversarial attacks. We propose a more robust method that incorporates abstract elements-such as event transitions-as key deciding factors to detect machine vs. human texts, by training a latent-space model on sequences of events or topics derived from human-written texts. On three different domains, machine generations which are originally inseparable from humans' on the token level can be better distinguished with our latent-space model, leading to a 31% improvement over strong baselines such as DetectGPT (Mitchell et al., 2023;Bao et al., 2024). Our analysis further reveals that, unlike humans, modern LLMs like GPT-4 generate event triggers and their transitions differently, an inherent disparity that help our method to robustly detect machine-generated texts.

Ask Lune

Ask anything. The answer quotes the paper.

Lune reads all of it and the papers around it, then shows you the passages behind every answer.

Questions to start from

Lune answers from

the full paper · 1 top-tier paper that cites it · related work

Get the answer

Free to start. No credit card required.

Cited by top-tier papers1

  1. Are Large Language Models Capable of Generating Human-Level Narratives?Yufei Tian, Tenghao Huang, Miri Liu, Derek Jiang et al.EMNLP 2024 · 22 citations

Builds on15

  1. DetectGPT: Zero-Shot Machine-Generated Text Detection using Probability CurvatureEric Mitchell, Yoonho Lee, Alexander Khazatsky, Christopher D. Manning et al.ICML 2023 · 988 citations
  2. A Watermark for Large Language ModelsJohn Kirchenbauer, Jonas Geiping, Yuxin Wen, Jonathan Katz et al.ICML 2023 · 854 citations
  3. RADAR: Robust AI-Text Detection via Adversarial LearningXiaomeng Hu, Pin-Yu Chen, Tsung-Yi HoNeurIPS 2023 · 315 citations
  4. Fast-DetectGPT: Efficient Zero-Shot Detection of Machine-Generated Text via Conditional Probability CurvatureGuangsheng Bao, Yanbin Zhao, Zhiyang Teng, Linyi Yang et al.ICLR 2024 · 311 citations
  5. Event Extraction as Machine Reading ComprehensionJian Liu, Yubo Chen, Kang Liu, Wei Bi et al.EMNLP 2020 · 300 citations

Related papers

  1. DNA-GPT: Divergent N-Gram Analysis for Training-Free Detection of GPT-Generated TextXianjun Yang, Wei Cheng, Yue Wu, Linda Ruth Petzold et al.ICLR 2024 · 173 citations
  2. On the Zero-Shot Generalization of Machine-Generated Text DetectorsXiao Pu, Jingyu Zhang, Xiaochuang Han, Yulia Tsvetkov et al.EMNLP Findings 2023 · 14 citations
  3. DNA-DetectLLM: Unveiling AI-Generated Text via a DNA-Inspired Mutation-Repair ParadigmXiaowei Zhu, Yubing Ren, Fang Fang, Qingfeng Tan et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 10 citations
  4. Training-free LLM-generated Text Detection by Mining Token Probability SequencesYihuai Xu, Yongwei Wang, Yifei Bi, Huangsen Cao et al.ICLR 2025
  5. WaveDetect: Robust Framework for Machine-Generated Text Detection via Wavelet TransformZhichen Liu, Kaitong Qin, Linhan He, Yang XuACL Findings 2026
Dusk over the sea between two cliffs drawn in fine vertical lines