EMNLP Findings2021
TURINGBENCH: A Benchmark Environment for Turing Test in the Age of Neural Text Generation
Adaku Uchendu, Zeyu Ma, Thai Le, Rui Zhang, Dongwon Lee
Abstract
Recent progress in generative language models has enabled machines to generate astonishingly realistic texts. While there are many legitimate applications of such models, there is also a rising need to distinguish machine-generated texts from human-written ones (e.g., fake news detection). However, to our best knowledge, there is currently no benchmark environment with datasets and tasks to systematically study the so-called "Turing Test" problem for neural text generation methods. In this work, we present the TURINGBENCH benchmark environment, which is comprised of (1) a dataset with 200K human-or machine-generated samples across 20 labels Human, GPT-1, GPT-2_small, GPT-2_medium, GPT-2_large, GPT-2_xl, GPT-2_PyTorch, GPT-3, GROVER_base, GROVER_large, GROVER_mega, CTRL, XLM, XLNET_base, XLNET_large, FAIR_wmt19, FAIR_wmt20, TRANS-FORMER_XL, PPLM_distil, PPLM_gpt2, (2) two benchmark tasks-i.e., Turing Test (TT) and Authorship Attribution (AA), and (3) a website with leaderboards. Our preliminary experimental results using TURINGBENCH show that FAIR_wmt20 and GPT-3 are the current winners, among all language models tested, in generating the most human-like indistinguishable texts with the lowest F1 score by five state-of-the-art TT detection models. The TURINGBENCH is available at: https: //turingbench.ist.psu.edu/
Ask Lune
Ask anything. The answer quotes the paper.
Lune reads all of it and the papers around it, then shows you the passages behind every answer.
Lune answers from
the full paper · 28 top-tier papers that cite it · related work
Free to start. No credit card required.
Cited by top-tier papers28
- AlpacaFarm: A Simulation Framework for Methods that Learn from Human FeedbackYann Dubois, Chen Xuechen Li, Rohan Taori, Tianyi Zhang et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 948 citations
- Whose Opinions Do Language Models Reflect?Shibani Santurkar, Esin Durmus, Faisal Ladhak, Cinoo Lee et al.ICML 2023 · 764 citations
- Do Language Models Plagiarize?Jooyoung Lee, Thai Le, Jinghui Chen, Dongwon LeeWWW 2023 · 109 citations
- DeTeCtive: Detecting AI-generated Text via Multi-Level Contrastive LearningXun Guo, Yongxin He, Shan Zhang, Ting Zhang et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 100 citations
- MGTBench: Benchmarking Machine-Generated Text DetectionXinlei He, Xinyue Shen, Zeyuan Chen, Michael Backes et al.CCS 2024 · 30 citations
Builds on7
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- Plug and Play Language Models: A Simple Approach to Controlled Text GenerationSumanth Dathathri, Andrea Madotto, Janice Lan, Jane Hung et al.ICLR 2020 · 1,166 citations
- Residual Energy-Based Models for Text GenerationYuntian Deng, Anton Bakhtin, Myle Ott, Arthur Szlam et al.ICLR 2020 · 147 citations
- Authorship Attribution for Neural Text GenerationAdaku Uchendu, Thai Le, Kai Shu, Dongwon LeeEMNLP 2020 · 110 citations
- Neural Deepfake Detection with Factual Structure of TextWanjun Zhong, Duyu Tang, Zenan Xu, Ruize Wang et al.EMNLP 2020 · 43 citations
Related papers
- OpenTuringBench: An Open-Model-based Benchmark and Framework for Machine-Generated Text Detection and AttributionLucio La Cava, Andrea TagarelliEMNLP 2025
- M4GT-Bench: Evaluation Benchmark for Black-Box Machine-Generated Text DetectionYuxia Wang, Jonibek Mansurov, Petar Ivanov, Jinyan Su et al.ACL 2024
- MAGE: Machine-generated Text Detection in the WildYafu Li, Qintong Li, Leyang Cui, Wei Bi et al.ACL 2024 · 44 citations
- HANSEN: Human and AI Spoken Text Benchmark for Authorship AnalysisNafis Irtiza Tripto, Adaku Uchendu, Thai Le, Mattia Setzu et al.EMNLP Findings 2023 · 6 citations
- TSM-Bench: Detecting LLM-Generated Text in Real-World Wikipedia Editing PracticesGerrit Quaremba, Elizabeth Black, Denny Vrandecic, Elena SimperlICLR 2026 · 2 citations
