LLMs Killed Q&A Stars? Analyzing the Impact of LLM-Generated Answers on an Online Q&A Platform
Dongwon Shin, Sooel Son
Abstract
Online question-and-answer (Q&A) platforms facilitate knowledge exchange through posted questions and answers. Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have shown their strong capability in generating high-quality answers, leading to a recent surge in LLM-generated answers (LGAs) on Q&A platforms. In this paper, we conduct an in-depth analysis of how LGAs affect Naver Knowledge iN , the most popular Q&A platform in South Korea. To this end, we implement nine state-of-the-art LLM-generated text (LGT) detection methods and evaluate their performance on answers collected from Naver Knowledge iN . We then build an ensemble detector by stacking the three best-performing LGT detection methods, achieving an AUC of 0.9987 with a false positive rate below 1%. Using this LGA detector, we identify 75, 558LGAs among 1.46M answers. We find that LGAs tend to be longer, use more punctuation marks, and exhibit higher lexical diversity. However, LGAs do not show clear differences in user reactions, such as upvotes, downvotes, or selection rates by questioners. We also find that LGAs are primarily intended for knowledge sharing rather than personal experiences sharing. Finally, we observe a shift in the Q&A platform: questions increasingly move from simple factseeking to those involving complex contexts and seeking personal opinions or past experiences.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 73a729c3-394f-40cb-a9fe-d1316ca1807eBuilds on16
- DetectGPT: Zero-Shot Machine-Generated Text Detection using Probability CurvatureEric Mitchell, Yoonho Lee, Alexander Khazatsky, Christopher D. Manning et al.ICML 2023 · 988 citations
- Fast-DetectGPT: Efficient Zero-Shot Detection of Machine-Generated Text via Conditional Probability CurvatureGuangsheng Bao, Yanbin Zhao, Zhiyang Teng, Linyi Yang et al.ICLR 2024 · 311 citations
- Can LLM-Generated Misinformation Be Detected?Canyu Chen, Kai ShuICLR 2024 · 270 citations
- Spotting LLMs With Binoculars: Zero-Shot Detection of Machine-Generated TextAbhimanyu Hans, Avi Schwarzschild, Valeriia Cherepanova, Hamid Kazemi et al.ICML 2024 · 262 citations
- DNA-GPT: Divergent N-Gram Analysis for Training-Free Detection of GPT-Generated TextXianjun Yang, Wei Cheng, Yue Wu, Linda Ruth Petzold et al.ICLR 2024 · 173 citations
Related papers
- XDAC: XAI-Driven Detection and Attribution of LLM-Generated News Comments in KoreanWooyoung Go, Hyoungshick Kim, Alice Oh, Yongdae KimACL 2025
- KatFishNet: Detecting LLM-Generated Korean Text through Linguistic Feature AnalysisShinwoo Park, Shubin Kim, Do-Kyung Kim, Yo-Sub HanACL 2025 · 6 citations
- DEMASQ: Unmasking the ChatGPT WordsmithKavita Kumari, Alessandro Pegoraro, Hossein Fereidooni, Ahmad-Reza SadeghiNDSS 2024
- How Much Do LLMs Hallucinate across Languages? On Realistic Multilingual Estimation of LLM HallucinationSaad Obaid ul Islam, Anne Lauscher, Goran GlavasEMNLP 2025
- Enhancing LLM Text Detection with Retrieved Contexts and Logits Distribution ConsistencyZhaoheng Huang, Yutao Zhu, Ji-Rong Wen, Zhicheng DouEMNLP 2025
