KatFishNet: Detecting LLM-Generated Korean Text through Linguistic Feature Analysis
Shinwoo Park, Shubin Kim, Do-Kyung Kim, Yo-Sub Han
Abstract
The rapid advancement of large language models (LLMs) increases the difficulty of distinguishing between human-written and LLM-generated text. Detecting LLM-generated text is crucial for upholding academic integrity, preventing plagiarism, protecting copyrights, and ensuring ethical research practices. Most prior studies on detecting LLM-generated text focus primarily on English text. However, languages with distinct morphological and syntactic characteristics require specialized detection approaches. Their unique structures and usage patterns can hinder the direct application of methods primarily designed for English. Among such languages, we focus on Korean, which has relatively flexible spacing rules, a rich morphological system, and less frequent comma usage compared to English. We introduce KatFish, the first benchmark dataset for detecting LLM-generated Korean text. The dataset consists of text written by humans and generated by four LLMs across three genres. By examining spacing patterns, part-of-speech diversity, and comma usage, we illuminate the linguistic differences between human-written and LLM-generated Korean text. Building on these observations, we propose KatFishNet, a detection method specifically designed for the Korean language. KatFishNet achieves an average of 19.78% higher AUROC compared to the best-performing existing detection method. Our code and data are available at https://github.com/Shinwoo-Park/detecting_llm_generated_korean_text_through_linguistic_analysis.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 4c9c3add-34dd-4707-aaca-c7bb0fa0b59aCited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on9
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- BARTScore: Evaluating Generated Text as Text GenerationWeizhe Yuan, Graham Neubig, Pengfei LiuNeurIPS 2021 · 1,143 citations
- DetectGPT: Zero-Shot Machine-Generated Text Detection using Probability CurvatureEric Mitchell, Yoonho Lee, Alexander Khazatsky, Christopher D. Manning et al.ICML 2023 · 988 citations
- A Watermark for Large Language ModelsJohn Kirchenbauer, Jonas Geiping, Yuxin Wen, Jonathan Katz et al.ICML 2023 · 854 citations
- MGTBench: Benchmarking Machine-Generated Text DetectionXinlei He, Xinyue Shen, Zeyuan Chen, Michael Backes et al.CCS 2024 · 30 citations
Related papers
- MAGE: Machine-generated Text Detection in the WildYafu Li, Qintong Li, Leyang Cui, Wei Bi et al.ACL 2024 · 44 citations
- Enhancing LLM Text Detection with Retrieved Contexts and Logits Distribution ConsistencyZhaoheng Huang, Yutao Zhu, Ji-Rong Wen, Zhicheng DouEMNLP 2025
- XDAC: XAI-Driven Detection and Attribution of LLM-Generated News Comments in KoreanWooyoung Go, Hyoungshick Kim, Alice Oh, Yongdae KimACL 2025
- K-HALU: Multiple Answer Korean Hallucination Benchmark for Large Language ModelsJaehyung Seo, Heuiseok LimICLR 2025
- How Large Language Models are Transforming Machine-Paraphrase PlagiarismJan Philip Wahle, Terry Ruas, Frederic Kirstein, Bela GippEMNLP 2022 · 26 citations
