Decentralized Action Integrity for Trigger-Action IoT Platforms
Earlence Fernandes, Amir Rahmati, Jaeyeon Jung, Atul Prakash
Abstract
Trigger-Action platforms are web-based systems that enable users to create automation rules by stitching together online services representing digital and physical resources using OAuth tokens. Unfortunately, these platforms introduce a longrange large-scale security risk: If they are compromised, an attacker can misuse the OAuth tokens belonging to a large number of users to arbitrarily manipulate their devices and data. We introduce Decentralized Action Integrity, a security principle that prevents an untrusted trigger-action platform from misusing compromised OAuth tokens in ways that are inconsistent with any given user's set of trigger-action rules. We present the design and evaluation of Decentralized Trigger-Action Platform (DTAP), a trigger-action platform that implements this principle by overcoming practical challenges. DTAP splits currently monolithic platform designs into an untrusted cloud service, and a set of user clients (each user only trusts their client). Our design introduces the concept of Transfer Tokens (XTokens) to practically use finegrained rule-specific tokens without increasing the number of OAuth permission prompts compared to current platforms. Our evaluation indicates that DTAP poses negligible overhead: it adds less than 15ms of latency to rule execution time, and reduces throughput by 2.5%.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext da740d89-203c-4f95-ac69-a44c41fea61eCited by top-tier papers25
- SoK: Security Evaluation of Home-Based IoT DeploymentsOmar Alrawi, Chaz Lever, Manos Antonakakis, Fabian MonroseS&P 2019 · 411 citations
- IoTGuard: Dynamic Enforcement of Security and Safety Policy in Commodity IoTZ. Berkay Celik, Gang Tan, Patrick D. McDanielNDSS 2019 · 254 citations
- Understanding and Improving Security and Privacy in Multi-User Smart Homes: A Design Exploration and In-Home User StudyEric Zeng, Franziska RoesnerUSENIX Security 2019 · 190 citations
- Charting the Attack Surface of Trigger-Action IoT PlatformsQi Wang, Pubali Datta, Wei Yang, Si Liu et al.CCS 2019 · 162 citations
- Discovering and Understanding the Security Hazards in the Interactions between IoT Devices, Mobile Apps, and Clouds on Smart Home PlatformsWei Zhou, Yan Jia, Yao Yao, Lipeng Zhu et al.USENIX Security 2019 · 160 citations
Builds on3
- Security Analysis of Emerging Smart Home ApplicationsEarlence Fernandes, Jaeyeon Jung, Atul PrakashS&P 2016 · 684 citations
- FlowFence: Practical Data Protection for Emerging IoT Application FrameworksEarlence Fernandes, Justin Paupore, Amir Rahmati, Daniel Simionato et al.USENIX Security 2016 · 296 citations
- A Comprehensive Formal Security Analysis of OAuth 2.0Daniel Fett, Ralf Küsters, Guido SchmitzCCS 2016 · 228 citations
Related papers
- Data Privacy in Trigger-Action SystemsYunang Chen, Amrita Roy Chowdhury, Ruizhe Wang, Andrei Sabelfeld et al.S&P 2021 · 22 citations
- Practical Data Access Minimization in Trigger-Action PlatformsYunang Chen, Mohannad Alhanahnah, Andrei Sabelfeld, Rahul Chatterjee et al.USENIX Security 2022
- Architecting Trigger-Action Platforms for Security, Performance and FunctionalityDeepak Sirone Jegan, Michael M. Swift, Earlence FernandesNDSS 2024
- Don't Bite Off More than You Can Chew: Investigating Excessive Permission Requests in Trigger-Action IntegrationsLiuhuo Wan, Kailong Wang, Kulani Mahadewa, Haoyu Wang et al.WWW 2024 · 4 citations
- Identifying privacy weaknesses from multi-party trigger-action integration platformsKulani Mahadewa, Yanjun Zhang, Guangdong Bai, Lei Bu et al.ISSTA 2021 · 25 citations
