Data Privacy in Trigger-Action Systems
Yunang Chen, Amrita Roy Chowdhury, Ruizhe Wang, Andrei Sabelfeld, Rahul Chatterjee, Earlence Fernandes
Abstract
Trigger-action platforms (TAPs) allow users to connect independent web-based or IoT services to achieve useful automation. They provide a simple interface that helps end-users create trigger-compute-action rules that pass data between disparate Internet services. Unfortunately, TAPs introduce a large-scale security risk: if they are compromised, attackers will gain access to sensitive data for millions of users. To avoid this risk, we propose eTAP, a privacy-enhancing trigger-action platform that executes trigger-compute-action rules without accessing users’ private data in plaintext or learning anything about the results of the computation. We use garbled circuits as a primitive, and leverage the unique structure of trigger-compute-action rules to make them practical. We formally state and prove the security guarantees of our protocols. We prototyped eTAP, which supports the most commonly used operations on popular commercial TAPs like IFTTT and Zapier. Specifically, it supports Boolean, arithmetic, and string operations on private trigger data and can run 100% of the top-500 rules of IFTTT users and 93.4% of all publicly-available rules on Zapier. Based on ten existing rules that exercise a wide variety of operations, we show that eTAP has a modest performance impact: on average rule execution latency increases by 70 ms (55%) and throughput reduces by 59%.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 1ece19ad-a9ed-4e5a-bf24-cdddaa7c9b1bCited by top-tier papers5
- Practical Data Access Minimization in Trigger-Action PlatformsYunang Chen, Mohannad Alhanahnah, Andrei Sabelfeld, Rahul Chatterjee et al.USENIX Security 2022
- Universal Cross-app Attacks: Exploiting and Securing OAuth 2.0 in Integration PlatformsKaixuan Luo, Xianbo Wang, Adonis P. H. Fung, Wing Cheong Lau et al.USENIX Security 2025
- Conditional Encryption with Applications to Secure Personalized Password Typo CorrectionMohammad Hassan Ameri, Jeremiah BlockiCCS 2024
- Architecting Trigger-Action Platforms for Security, Performance and FunctionalityDeepak Sirone Jegan, Michael M. Swift, Earlence FernandesNDSS 2024
- LazyTAP: On-Demand Data Minimization for Trigger-Action ApplicationsMohammad M. Ahmadpanah, Daniel Hedin, Andrei SabelfeldS&P 2023
Builds on7
- Foreshadow: Extracting the Keys to the Intel SGX Kingdom with Transient Out-of-Order ExecutionJo Van Bulck, Marina Minkin, Ofir Weisse, Daniel Genkin et al.USENIX Security 2018 · 1,175 citations
- Plundervolt: Software-based Fault Injection Attacks against Intel SGXKit Murdock, David F. Oswald, Flavio D. Garcia, Jo Van Bulck et al.S&P 2020 · 369 citations
- Charting the Attack Surface of Trigger-Action IoT PlatformsQi Wang, Pubali Datta, Wei Yang, Si Liu et al.CCS 2019 · 162 citations
- If This Then What?: Controlling Flows in IoT AppsIulia Bastys, Musard Balliu, Andrei SabelfeldCCS 2018 · 119 citations
- Faster Malicious 2-Party Secure Computation with Online/Offline Dual ExecutionPeter Rindal, Mike RosulekUSENIX Security 2016 · 63 citations
Related papers
- Decentralized Action Integrity for Trigger-Action IoT PlatformsEarlence Fernandes, Amir Rahmati, Jaeyeon Jung, Atul PrakashNDSS 2018 · 14 citations
- SandTrap: Securing JavaScript-driven Trigger-Action PlatformsMohammad M. Ahmadpanah, Daniel Hedin, Musard Balliu, Lars Eric Olsson et al.USENIX Security 2021 · 31 citations
- Don't Bite Off More than You Can Chew: Investigating Excessive Permission Requests in Trigger-Action IntegrationsLiuhuo Wan, Kailong Wang, Kulani Mahadewa, Haoyu Wang et al.WWW 2024 · 4 citations
- Identifying privacy weaknesses from multi-party trigger-action integration platformsKulani Mahadewa, Yanjun Zhang, Guangdong Bai, Lei Bu et al.ISSTA 2021 · 25 citations
- TAPFixer: Automatic Detection and Repair of Home Automation Vulnerabilities based on Negated-property ReasoningYinbo Yu, Yuanqi Xu, Kepu Huang, Jiajia LiuUSENIX Security 2024 · 6 citations
