Don't Bite Off More than You Can Chew: Investigating Excessive Permission Requests in Trigger-Action Integrations
Liuhuo Wan, Kailong Wang, Kulani Mahadewa, Haoyu Wang, Guangdong Bai
Abstract
Web-based trigger-action platforms (TAP) allow users to integrate Internet of Things (IoT) systems and online services into triggeraction integrations (TAIs), facilitating rich automation tasks known as applets. Despite their benefits, these integrations (typically involving the TAP, trigger, and action service providers) pose significant security and privacy challenges, such as mis-triggering and data leakage. This work investigates cross-entity permission management within TAIs to address the underlying causes of these security and privacy issues, emphasizing permission-functionality consistency to ensure fairness in permission requests. We introduce PFCon, a system that leverages GPT-based language models for analyzing required and requested permissions, revealing excessive permission requests in a large-scale study of IFTTT TAP. Our findings highlight the need for service providers to enforce permission-functionality consistency, raising awareness of the importance of security and privacy in TAI. CCS CONCEPTS • Security and privacy → Web application security; • Networks → Network privacy and anonymity.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 110f98d5-e839-419c-a31e-5fa67f6135adCited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on17
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- ContexloT: Towards Providing Contextual Integrity to Appified IoT PlatformsYunhan Jack Jia, Qi Alfred Chen, Shiqi Wang, Amir Rahmati et al.NDSS 2017 · 325 citations
- Sensitive Information Tracking in Commodity IoTZ. Berkay Celik, Leonardo Babun, Amit Kumar Sikder, Hidayet Aksu et al.USENIX Security 2018 · 236 citations
- Fear and Logging in the Internet of ThingsQi Wang, Wajih Ul Hassan, Adam Bates, Carl A. GunterNDSS 2018 · 205 citations
- Charting the Attack Surface of Trigger-Action IoT PlatformsQi Wang, Pubali Datta, Wei Yang, Si Liu et al.CCS 2019 · 162 citations
Related papers
- Identifying privacy weaknesses from multi-party trigger-action integration platformsKulani Mahadewa, Yanjun Zhang, Guangdong Bai, Lei Bu et al.ISSTA 2021 · 25 citations
- Practical Data Access Minimization in Trigger-Action PlatformsYunang Chen, Mohannad Alhanahnah, Andrei Sabelfeld, Rahul Chatterjee et al.USENIX Security 2022
- Decentralized Action Integrity for Trigger-Action IoT PlatformsEarlence Fernandes, Amir Rahmati, Jaeyeon Jung, Atul PrakashNDSS 2018 · 14 citations
- Data Privacy in Trigger-Action SystemsYunang Chen, Amrita Roy Chowdhury, Ruizhe Wang, Andrei Sabelfeld et al.S&P 2021 · 22 citations
- TKPERM: Cross-platform Permission Knowledge Transfer to Detect Overprivileged Third-party ApplicationsFaysal Hossain Shezan, Kaiming Cheng, Zhen Zhang, Yinzhi Cao et al.NDSS 2020
