USENIX Security2022Top-tier venue
Practical Data Access Minimization in Trigger-Action Platforms
Yunang Chen, Mohannad Alhanahnah, Andrei Sabelfeld, Rahul Chatterjee, Earlence Fernandes
Abstract
Trigger-Action Platforms (TAPs) connect disparate online services and enable users to create automation rules in diverse domains such as smart homes and business productivity. Unfortunately, the current design of TAPs is flawed from a privacy perspective, allowing unfettered access to sensitive user data. We point out that it suffers from two types of overprivilege: (1) attribute-level, where it has access to more data attributes than it needs for running user-created rules; and (2) token-level, where it has access to more APIs than it needs. To mitigate overprivilege and subsequent privacy concerns we design and implement minTAP, a practical approach to data access minimization in TAPs. Our key insight is that the semantics of a user-created automation rule implicitly specifies the minimal amount of data it needs. This allows minTAP to leverage language-based data minimization to apply the principle of least-privilege by releasing only the necessary attributes of user data to TAPs and fending off unrelated API access. Using real user-created rules on the popular IFTTT TAP, we demonstrate that minTAP sanitizes a median of 4 sensitive data attributes per rule, with modest performance overhead and without modifying IFTTT.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 47e20102-da83-4cc8-b642-37896d396bc9Cited by top-tier papers3
- Don't Bite Off More than You Can Chew: Investigating Excessive Permission Requests in Trigger-Action IntegrationsLiuhuo Wan, Kailong Wang, Kulani Mahadewa, Haoyu Wang et al.WWW 2024 · 4 citations
- Architecting Trigger-Action Platforms for Security, Performance and FunctionalityDeepak Sirone Jegan, Michael M. Swift, Earlence FernandesNDSS 2024
- LazyTAP: On-Demand Data Minimization for Trigger-Action ApplicationsMohammad M. Ahmadpanah, Daniel Hedin, Andrei SabelfeldS&P 2023
Builds on9
- Foreshadow: Extracting the Keys to the Intel SGX Kingdom with Transient Out-of-Order ExecutionJo Van Bulck, Marina Minkin, Ofir Weisse, Daniel Genkin et al.USENIX Security 2018 · 1,175 citations
- Plundervolt: Software-based Fault Injection Attacks against Intel SGXKit Murdock, David F. Oswald, Flavio D. Garcia, Jo Van Bulck et al.S&P 2020 · 369 citations
- Fear and Logging in the Internet of ThingsQi Wang, Wajih Ul Hassan, Adam Bates, Carl A. GunterNDSS 2018 · 205 citations
- Charting the Attack Surface of Trigger-Action IoT PlatformsQi Wang, Pubali Datta, Wei Yang, Si Liu et al.CCS 2019 · 162 citations
- If This Then What?: Controlling Flows in IoT AppsIulia Bastys, Musard Balliu, Andrei SabelfeldCCS 2018 · 119 citations
Related papers
- Data Privacy in Trigger-Action SystemsYunang Chen, Amrita Roy Chowdhury, Ruizhe Wang, Andrei Sabelfeld et al.S&P 2021 · 22 citations
- Identifying privacy weaknesses from multi-party trigger-action integration platformsKulani Mahadewa, Yanjun Zhang, Guangdong Bai, Lei Bu et al.ISSTA 2021 · 25 citations
- Decentralized Action Integrity for Trigger-Action IoT PlatformsEarlence Fernandes, Amir Rahmati, Jaeyeon Jung, Atul PrakashNDSS 2018 · 14 citations
- SandTrap: Securing JavaScript-driven Trigger-Action PlatformsMohammad M. Ahmadpanah, Daniel Hedin, Musard Balliu, Lars Eric Olsson et al.USENIX Security 2021 · 31 citations
- TAPFixer: Automatic Detection and Repair of Home Automation Vulnerabilities based on Negated-property ReasoningYinbo Yu, Yuanqi Xu, Kepu Huang, Jiajia LiuUSENIX Security 2024 · 6 citations
