Security Analysis of Emerging Smart Home Applications
Earlence Fernandes, Jaeyeon Jung, Atul Prakash
Abstract
Recently, several competing smart home programming frameworks that support third party app development have emerged. These frameworks provide tangible benefits to users, but can also expose users to significant security risks. This paper presents the first in-depth empirical security analysis of one such emerging smart home programming platform. We analyzed Samsung-owned SmartThings, which has the largest number of apps among currently available smart home platforms, and supports a broad range of devices including motion sensors, fire alarms, and door locks. SmartThings hosts the application runtime on a proprietary, closed-source cloud backend, making scrutiny challenging. We overcame the challenge with a static source code analysis of 499 SmartThings apps (called SmartApps) and 132 device handlers, and carefully crafted test cases that revealed many undocumented features of the platform. Our key findings are twofold. First, although SmartThings implements a privilege separation model, we discovered two intrinsic design flaws that lead to significant overprivilege in SmartApps. Our analysis reveals that over 55% of SmartApps in the store are overprivileged due to the capabilities being too coarse-grained. Moreover, once installed, a SmartApp is granted full access to a device even if it specifies needing only limited access to the device. Second, the SmartThings event subsystem, which devices use to communicate asynchronously with SmartApps via events, does not sufficiently protect events that carry sensitive information such as lock codes. We exploited framework design flaws to construct four proof-of-concept attacks that: (1) secretly planted door lock codes, (2) stole existing door lock codes, (3) disabled vacation mode of the home, and (4) induced a fake fire alarm. We conclude the paper with security lessons for the design of emerging smart home programming frameworks.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext bd7eba71-3e64-4696-adee-11b9004a840eCited by top-tier papers65
- Understanding the Mirai BotnetManos Antonakakis, Tim April, Michael D. Bailey, Matt Bernhard et al.USENIX Security 2017 · 2,003 citations
- SoK: Security Evaluation of Home-Based IoT DeploymentsOmar Alrawi, Chaz Lever, Manos Antonakakis, Fabian MonroseS&P 2019 · 411 citations
- BlackIoT: IoT Botnet of High Wattage Devices Can Disrupt the Power GridSaleh Soltan, Prateek Mittal, H. Vincent PoorUSENIX Security 2018 · 348 citations
- ContexloT: Towards Providing Contextual Integrity to Appified IoT PlatformsYunhan Jack Jia, Qi Alfred Chen, Shiqi Wang, Amir Rahmati et al.NDSS 2017 · 325 citations
- FlowFence: Practical Data Protection for Emerging IoT Application FrameworksEarlence Fernandes, Justin Paupore, Amir Rahmati, Daniel Simionato et al.USENIX Security 2016 · 296 citations
Related papers
- HoMonit: Monitoring Smart Home Apps from Encrypted TrafficWei Zhang, Yan Meng, Yugeng Liu, Xiaokuan Zhang et al.CCS 2018 · 201 citations
- Fear and Logging in the Internet of ThingsQi Wang, Wajih Ul Hassan, Adam Bates, Carl A. GunterNDSS 2018 · 205 citations
- Discovering and Understanding the Security Hazards in the Interactions between IoT Devices, Mobile Apps, and Clouds on Smart Home PlatformsWei Zhou, Yan Jia, Yao Yao, Lipeng Zhu et al.USENIX Security 2019 · 160 citations
- On the Safety of IoT Device Physical Interaction ControlWenbo Ding, Hongxin HuCCS 2018 · 169 citations
- IoTGaze: IoT Security Enforcement via Wireless Context AnalysisTianbo Gu, Zheng Fang, Allaukik Abhishek, Hao Fu et al.INFOCOM 2020 · 52 citations
