ContexloT: Towards Providing Contextual Integrity to Appified IoT Platforms
Yunhan Jack Jia, Qi Alfred Chen, Shiqi Wang, Amir Rahmati, Earlence Fernandes, Zhuoqing Morley Mao, Atul Prakash
Abstract
The Internet-of-Things (IoT) has quickly evolved to a new appified era where third-party developers can write apps for IoT platforms using programming frameworks. Like other appified platforms, e.g., the smartphone platform, the permission system plays an important role in platform security. However, design flaws in current IoT platform permission models have been reported recently, exposing users to significant harm such as break-ins and theft. To solve these problems, a new access control model is needed for both current and future IoT platforms. In this paper, we propose ContexIoT, a context-based permission system for appified IoT platforms that provides contextual integrity by supporting fine-grained context identification for sensitive actions, and runtime prompts with rich context information to help users perform effective access control. Context definition in ContexIoT is at the inter-procedure control and data flow levels, that we show to be more comprehensive than previous context-based permission systems for the smartphone platform. ContexIoT is designed to be backward compatible and thus can be directly adopted by current IoT platforms. We prototype ContexIoT on the Samsung SmartThings platform, with an automatic app patching mechanism developed to support unmodified commodity SmartThings apps. To evaluate the system's effectiveness, we perform the first extensive study of possible attacks on appified IoT platforms by reproducing reported IoT attacks and constructing new IoT attacks based on smartphone malware classes. We categorize these attacks based on lifecycle and adversary techniques, and build the first taxonomized IoT attack app dataset. Evaluating ContexIoT on this dataset, we find that it can effectively distinguish the attack context for all the tested apps. The performance evaluation on 283 commodity IoT apps shows that the app patching adds nearly negligible delay to the event triggering latency, and the permission request frequency is far below the threshold that is considered to risk user habituation or annoyance. 1 SmartThings uses the term capability instead of permission [35] Permission to freely reproduce all or part of this paper for noncommercial purposes is granted provided that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Reproduction for commercial purposes is strictly prohibited without the prior written consent of the Internet Society, the first-named author (for reproduction of an entire paper only), and the author's employer if the paper was prepared within the scope of employment.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 72656539-e1b8-4802-8def-a3a4c24f7645Cited by top-tier papers20
- Rethinking Access Control and Authentication for the Home Internet of Things (IoT)Weijia He, Maximilian Golla, Roshni Padhi, Jordan Ofek et al.USENIX Security 2018 · 221 citations
- Understanding and Improving Security and Privacy in Multi-User Smart Homes: A Design Exploration and In-Home User StudyEric Zeng, Franziska RoesnerUSENIX Security 2019 · 190 citations
- All Things Considered: An Analysis of IoT Devices on Home NetworksDeepak Kumar, Kelly Shen, Benton Case, Deepali Garg et al.USENIX Security 2019 · 189 citations
- Dangerous Skills: Understanding and Mitigating Security Risks of Voice-Controlled Third-Party Functions on Virtual Personal Assistant SystemsNan Zhang, Xianghang Mi, Xuan Feng, XiaoFeng Wang et al.S&P 2019 · 160 citations
- SoK: A Minimalist Approach to Formalizing Analog Sensor SecurityChen Yan, Hocheol Shin, Connor Bolton, Wenyuan Xu et al.S&P 2020 · 86 citations
Builds on13
- Security Analysis of Emerging Smart Home ApplicationsEarlence Fernandes, Jaeyeon Jung, Atul PrakashS&P 2016 · 684 citations
- FlowFence: Practical Data Protection for Emerging IoT Application FrameworksEarlence Fernandes, Justin Paupore, Amir Rahmati, Daniel Simionato et al.USENIX Security 2016 · 296 citations
- On Demystifying the Android Application Framework: Re-Visiting Android Permission Specification AnalysisMichael Backes, Sven Bugiel, Erik Derr, Patrick D. McDaniel et al.USENIX Security 2016 · 161 citations
- TriggerScope: Towards Detecting Logic Bombs in Android ApplicationsYanick Fratantonio, Antonio Bianchi, William K. Robertson, Engin Kirda et al.S&P 2016 · 161 citations
- Harvesting Runtime Values in Android Applications That Feature Anti-Analysis TechniquesSiegfried Rasthofer, Steven Arzt, Marc Miltenberger, Eric BoddenNDSS 2016 · 157 citations
Related papers
- IoTGuard: Dynamic Enforcement of Security and Safety Policy in Commodity IoTZ. Berkay Celik, Gang Tan, Patrick D. McDanielNDSS 2019 · 254 citations
- Fear and Logging in the Internet of ThingsQi Wang, Wajih Ul Hassan, Adam Bates, Carl A. GunterNDSS 2018 · 205 citations
- SmartAuth: User-Centered Authorization for the Internet of ThingsYuan Tian, Nan Zhang, Yue-Hsun Lin, XiaoFeng Wang et al.USENIX Security 2017 · 231 citations
- On the Safety of IoT Device Physical Interaction ControlWenbo Ding, Hongxin HuCCS 2018 · 169 citations
- IoTGaze: IoT Security Enforcement via Wireless Context AnalysisTianbo Gu, Zheng Fang, Allaukik Abhishek, Hao Fu et al.INFOCOM 2020 · 52 citations
