How many degrees of freedom do we need to train deep networks: a loss landscape perspective
Brett W. Larsen, Stanislav Fort, Nic Becker, Surya Ganguli
Abstract
A variety of recent works, spanning pruning, lottery tickets, and training within random subspaces, have shown that deep neural networks can be trained using far fewer degrees of freedom than the total number of parameters. We analyze this phenomenon for random subspaces by first examining the success probability of hitting a training loss sub-level set when training within a random subspace of a given training dimensionality. We find a sharp phase transition in the success probability from to as the training dimension surpasses a threshold. This threshold training dimension increases as the desired final loss decreases, but decreases as the initial loss decreases. We then theoretically explain the origin of this phase transition, and its dependence on initialization and final desired loss, in terms of properties of the high-dimensional geometry of the loss landscape. In particular, we show via Gordon's escape theorem, that the training dimension plus the Gaussian width of the desired loss sub-level set, projected onto a unit sphere surrounding the initialization, must exceed the total number of parameters for the success probability to be large. In several architectures and datasets, we measure the threshold training dimension as a function of initialization and demonstrate that it is a small fraction of the total parameters, implying by our theory that successful training with so few dimensions is possible precisely because the Gaussian width of low loss sub-level sets is very large. Moreover, we compare this threshold training dimension to more sophisticated ways of reducing training degrees of freedom, including lottery tickets as well as a new, analogous method: lottery subspaces. Code is available at https://github.com/ganguli-lab/degrees-of-freedom.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext d29b6fb5-63ef-4f59-94d2-885acb9808f5Cited by top-tier papers17
- GaLore: Memory-Efficient LLM Training by Gradient Low-Rank ProjectionJiawei Zhao, Zhenyu Zhang, Beidi Chen, Zhangyang Wang et al.ICML 2024 · 433 citations
- Memory-Efficient LLM Training with Online Subspace DescentKaizhao Liang, Bo Liu, Lizhang Chen, Qiang LiuNeurIPS 2024 · 46 citations
- VeLoRA: Memory Efficient Training using Rank-1 Sub-Token ProjectionsRoy Miles, Pradyumna Reddy, Ismail Elezi, Jiankang DengNeurIPS 2024 · 22 citations
- LoQT: Low-Rank Adapters for Quantized PretrainingSebastian Loeschcke, Mads Toftrup, Michael J. Kastoryano, Serge J. Belongie et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 14 citations
- How Sparse Can We Prune A Deep Network: A Fundamental Limit PerspectiveQiaozhe Zhang, Ruijie Zhang, Jun Sun, Yingzhuang LiuNeurIPS 2024 · 14 citations
Builds on4
- Pruning neural networks without any data by iteratively conserving synaptic flowHidenori Tanaka, Daniel Kunin, Daniel L. K. Yamins, Surya GanguliNeurIPS 2020 · 884 citations
- Picking Winning Tickets Before Training by Preserving Gradient FlowChaoqi Wang, Guodong Zhang, Roger B. GrosseICLR 2020 · 743 citations
- Deep learning versus kernel learning: an empirical study of loss landscape geometry and the time evolution of the Neural Tangent KernelStanislav Fort, Gintare Karolina Dziugaite, Mansheej Paul, Sepideh Kharaghani et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 255 citations
- The Break-Even Point on Optimization Trajectories of Deep Neural NetworksStanislaw Jastrzebski, Maciej Szymczak, Stanislav Fort, Devansh Arpit et al.ICLR 2020 · 198 citations
Related papers
- Polynomially Over-Parameterized Convolutional Neural Networks Contain Structured Strong Winning Lottery TicketsArthur da Cunha, Francesco d'Amore, Emanuele NataleNeurIPS 2023 · 5 citations
- On the Existence of Universal Lottery TicketsRebekka Burkholz, Nilanjana Laha, Rajarshi Mukherjee, Alkis GotovosICLR 2022 · 38 citations
- Dual Lottery Ticket HypothesisYue Bai, Huan Wang, Zhiqiang Tao, Kunpeng Li et al.ICLR 2022 · 49 citations
- Logarithmic Pruning is All You NeedLaurent Orseau, Marcus Hutter, Omar RivasplataNeurIPS 2020 · 102 citations
- Validating the Lottery Ticket Hypothesis with Inertial Manifold TheoryZeru Zhang, Jiayin Jin, Zijie Zhang, Yang Zhou et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 45 citations
