Polynomially Over-Parameterized Convolutional Neural Networks Contain Structured Strong Winning Lottery Tickets
Arthur da Cunha, Francesco d'Amore, Emanuele Natale
Abstract
The Strong Lottery Ticket Hypothesis (SLTH) states that randomly-initialised neural networks likely contain subnetworks that perform well without any training. Although unstructured pruning has been extensively studied in this context, its structured counterpart, which can deliver significant computational and memory efficiency gains, has been largely unexplored. One of the main reasons for this gap is the limitations of the underlying mathematical tools used in formal analyses of the SLTH. In this paper, we overcome these limitations: we leverage recent advances in the multidimensional generalisation of the Random Subset-Sum Problem and obtain a variant that admits the stochastic dependencies that arise when addressing structured pruning in the SLTH. We apply this result to prove, for a wide class of random Convolutional Neural Networks, the existence of structured subnetworks that can approximate any sufficiently smaller network. This result provides the first sub-exponential bound around the SLTH for structured pruning, opening up new avenues for further research on the hypothesis and contributing to the understanding of the role of over-parameterization in deep learning.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 64cf39f0-bebe-43cb-b54b-337d51f9798dCited by top-tier papers2
- On the Sparsity of the Strong Lottery Ticket HypothesisEmanuele Natale, Davide Ferré, Giordano Giambartolomei, Frédéric Giroire et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 5 citations
- The Strong Lottery Ticket Hypothesis for Multi-Head Attention MechanismsHikari Otsuka, Daiki Chijiwa, Yasuyuki Okoshi, Daichi Fujiki et al.AAAI 2026
Builds on10
- Proving the Lottery Ticket Hypothesis: Pruning is All You NeedEran Malach, Gilad Yehudai, Shai Shalev-Shwartz, Ohad ShamirICML 2020 · 327 citations
- Pruning from ScratchYulong Wang, Xiaolu Zhang, Lingxi Xie, Jun Zhou et al.AAAI 2020 · 219 citations
- Optimal Lottery Tickets via Subset Sum: Logarithmic Over-Parameterization is SufficientAnkit Pensia, Shashank Rajput, Alliot Nagle, Harit Vishwakarma et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 115 citations
- Logarithmic Pruning is All You NeedLaurent Orseau, Marcus Hutter, Omar RivasplataNeurIPS 2020 · 102 citations
- Most Activation Functions Can Win the Lottery Without Excessive DepthRebekka BurkholzNeurIPS 2022 · 27 citations
Related papers
- Proving the Lottery Ticket Hypothesis for Convolutional Neural NetworksArthur da Cunha, Emanuele Natale, Laurent ViennotICLR 2022 · 31 citations
- On the Existence of Universal Lottery TicketsRebekka Burkholz, Nilanjana Laha, Rajarshi Mukherjee, Alkis GotovosICLR 2022 · 38 citations
- A General Framework For Proving The Equivariant Strong Lottery Ticket HypothesisDamien Ferbach, Christos Tsirigotis, Gauthier Gidel, Avishek Joey BoseICLR 2023 · 1 citation
- Convolutional and Residual Networks Provably Contain Lottery TicketsRebekka BurkholzICML 2022 · 18 citations
- Why Lottery Ticket Wins? A Theoretical Perspective of Sample Complexity on Sparse Neural NetworksShuai Zhang, Meng Wang, Sijia Liu, Pin-Yu Chen et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 28 citations
