Optimal Lottery Tickets via Subset Sum: Logarithmic Over-Parameterization is Sufficient
Ankit Pensia, Shashank Rajput, Alliot Nagle, Harit Vishwakarma, Dimitris S. Papailiopoulos
Abstract
The strong lottery ticket hypothesis (LTH) postulates that one can approximate any target neural network by only pruning the weights of a sufficiently over-parameterized random network. A recent work by Malach et al. establishes the first theoretical analysis for the strong LTH: one can provably approximate a neural network of width and depth , by pruning a random one that is a factor wider and twice as deep. This polynomial over-parameterization requirement is at odds with recent experimental research that achieves good approximation with networks that are a small factor wider than the target. In this work, we close the gap and offer an exponential improvement to the over-parameterization requirement for the existence of lottery tickets. We show that any target network of width and depth can be approximated by pruning a random network that is a factor wider and twice as deep. Our analysis heavily relies on connecting pruning random ReLU networks to random instances of the SubsetSum problem. We then show that this logarithmic over-parameterization is essentially optimal for constant depth networks. Finally, we verify several of our theoretical insights with experiments.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 2062fe4e-fecb-4ae0-84c1-c5f35d3bffe8Cited by top-tier papers42
- Monarch: Expressive Structured Matrices for Efficient and Accurate TrainingTri Dao, Beidi Chen, Nimit Sharad Sohoni, Arjun D. Desai et al.ICML 2022 · 125 citations
- Logarithmic Pruning is All You NeedLaurent Orseau, Marcus Hutter, Omar RivasplataNeurIPS 2020 · 102 citations
- Pixelated Butterfly: Simple and Efficient Sparse training for Neural Network ModelsBeidi Chen, Tri Dao, Kaizhao Liang, Jiaming Yang et al.ICLR 2022 · 94 citations
- A Winning Hand: Compressing Deep Networks Can Improve Out-of-Distribution RobustnessJames Diffenderfer, Brian R. Bartoldson, Shreya Chaganti, Jize Zhang et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 88 citations
- MixMo: Mixing Multiple Inputs for Multiple Outputs via Deep SubnetworksAlexandre Ramé, Rémy Sun, Matthieu CordICCV 2021 · 64 citations
Builds on4
- Linear Mode Connectivity and the Lottery Ticket HypothesisJonathan Frankle, Gintare Karolina Dziugaite, Daniel M. Roy, Michael CarbinICML 2020 · 750 citations
- Proving the Lottery Ticket Hypothesis: Pruning is All You NeedEran Malach, Gilad Yehudai, Shai Shalev-Shwartz, Ohad ShamirICML 2020 · 327 citations
- Logarithmic Pruning is All You NeedLaurent Orseau, Marcus Hutter, Omar RivasplataNeurIPS 2020 · 102 citations
- What's Hidden in a Randomly Weighted Neural Network?Vivek Ramanujan, Mitchell Wortsman, Aniruddha Kembhavi, Ali Farhadi et al.CVPR 2020
Related papers
- Most Activation Functions Can Win the Lottery Without Excessive DepthRebekka BurkholzNeurIPS 2022 · 27 citations
- Polynomially Over-Parameterized Convolutional Neural Networks Contain Structured Strong Winning Lottery TicketsArthur da Cunha, Francesco d'Amore, Emanuele NataleNeurIPS 2023 · 5 citations
- Proving the Lottery Ticket Hypothesis for Convolutional Neural NetworksArthur da Cunha, Emanuele Natale, Laurent ViennotICLR 2022 · 31 citations
- On the Sparsity of the Strong Lottery Ticket HypothesisEmanuele Natale, Davide Ferré, Giordano Giambartolomei, Frédéric Giroire et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 5 citations
- Why Random Pruning Is All We Need to Start SparseAdvait Harshal Gadhikar, Sohom Mukherjee, Rebekka BurkholzICML 2023 · 33 citations
