Why Random Pruning Is All We Need to Start Sparse
Advait Harshal Gadhikar, Sohom Mukherjee, Rebekka Burkholz
Abstract
Random masks define surprisingly effective sparse neural network models, as has been shown empirically. The resulting sparse networks can often compete with dense architectures and stateof-the-art lottery ticket pruning algorithms, even though they do not rely on computationally expensive prune-train iterations and can be drawn initially without significant computational overhead. We offer a theoretical explanation of how random masks can approximate arbitrary target networks if they are wider by a logarithmic factor in the inverse sparsity 1/ log(1/sparsity). This overparameterization factor is necessary at least for 3-layer random networks, which elucidates the observed degrading performance of random networks at higher sparsity. At moderate to high sparsity levels, however, our results imply that sparser networks are contained within random source networks so that any dense-to-sparse training scheme can be turned into a computationally more efficient sparse to sparse one by constraining the search to a fixed random mask. We demonstrate the feasibility of this approach in experiments for different pruning methods and propose particularly effective choices of initial layer-wise sparsity ratios of the random source network. As a special case, we show theoretically and experimentally that random source networks also contain strong lottery tickets. Our code is available at https://github.com/ RelationalML/sparse_to_sparse .
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext d42c7e9c-857e-4ab8-b75d-7a33ffa852d0Cited by top-tier papers13
- A Simple and Effective Pruning Approach for Large Language ModelsMingjie Sun, Zhuang Liu, Anna Bair, J. Zico KolterICLR 2024 · 794 citations
- Spectral Graph Pruning Against Over-Squashing and Over-SmoothingAdarsh Jamadandi, Celia Rubio-Madrigal, Rebekka BurkholzNeurIPS 2024 · 33 citations
- Masks, Signs, And Learning Rate RewindingAdvait Harshal Gadhikar, Rebekka BurkholzICLR 2024 · 15 citations
- Understanding MLP-Mixer as a wide and sparse MLPTomohiro Hayase, Ryo KarakidaICML 2024 · 9 citations
- Short-LVLM: Compressing and Accelerating Large Vision-Language Models by Pruning Redundant LayersJi Ma, Wei Suo, Peng Wang, Yanning ZhangACM MM 2025 · 9 citations
Builds on31
- Pruning neural networks without any data by iteratively conserving synaptic flowHidenori Tanaka, Daniel Kunin, Daniel L. K. Yamins, Surya GanguliNeurIPS 2020 · 884 citations
- Picking Winning Tickets Before Training by Preserving Gradient FlowChaoqi Wang, Guodong Zhang, Roger B. GrosseICLR 2020 · 743 citations
- Rigging the Lottery: Making All Tickets WinnersUtku Evci, Trevor Gale, Jacob Menick, Pablo Samuel Castro et al.ICML 2020 · 723 citations
- Retiring Adult: New Datasets for Fair Machine LearningFrances Ding, Moritz Hardt, John Miller, Ludwig SchmidtNeurIPS 2021 · 671 citations
- Comparing Rewinding and Fine-tuning in Neural Network PruningAlex Renda, Jonathan Frankle, Michael CarbinICLR 2020 · 437 citations
Related papers
- Proving the Lottery Ticket Hypothesis for Convolutional Neural NetworksArthur da Cunha, Emanuele Natale, Laurent ViennotICLR 2022 · 31 citations
- Optimal Lottery Tickets via Subset Sum: Logarithmic Over-Parameterization is SufficientAnkit Pensia, Shashank Rajput, Alliot Nagle, Harit Vishwakarma et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 115 citations
- Dual Lottery Ticket HypothesisYue Bai, Huan Wang, Zhiqiang Tao, Kunpeng Li et al.ICLR 2022 · 49 citations
- Most Activation Functions Can Win the Lottery Without Excessive DepthRebekka BurkholzNeurIPS 2022 · 27 citations
- Plant 'n' Seek: Can You Find the Winning Ticket?Jonas Fischer, Rebekka BurkholzICLR 2022 · 21 citations
