The Break-Even Point on Optimization Trajectories of Deep Neural Networks
Stanislaw Jastrzebski, Maciej Szymczak, Stanislav Fort, Devansh Arpit, Jacek Tabor, Kyunghyun Cho, Krzysztof J. Geras
Abstract
The early phase of training of deep neural networks is critical for their final performance. In this work, we study how the hyperparameters of stochastic gradient descent (SGD) used in the early phase of training affect the rest of the optimization trajectory. We argue for the existence of the "break-even" point on this trajectory, beyond which the curvature of the loss surface and noise in the gradient are implicitly regularized by SGD. In particular, we demonstrate on multiple classification tasks that using a large learning rate in the initial phase of training reduces the variance of the gradient, and improves the conditioning of the covariance of gradients. These effects are beneficial from the optimization perspective and become visible after the break-even point. Complementing prior work, we also show that using a low learning rate results in bad conditioning of the loss surface even for a neural network with batch normalization layers. In short, our work shows that key properties of the loss surface are strongly influenced by SGD in the early phase of training. We argue that studying the impact of the identified effects on generalization is a promising future direction.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext cc76234f-1add-42bd-9fd9-c779eb6d87aaCited by top-tier papers95
- How Do Vision Transformers Work?Namuk Park, Songkuk KimICLR 2022 · 653 citations
- Pruning Neural Networks at Initialization: Why Are We Missing the Mark?Jonathan Frankle, Gintare Karolina Dziugaite, Daniel M. Roy, Michael CarbinICLR 2021 · 261 citations
- Deep learning versus kernel learning: an empirical study of loss landscape geometry and the time evolution of the Neural Tangent KernelStanislav Fort, Gintare Karolina Dziugaite, Mansheej Paul, Sepideh Kharaghani et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 255 citations
- On the Origin of Implicit Regularization in Stochastic Gradient DescentSamuel L. Smith, Benoit Dherin, David G. T. Barrett, Soham DeICLR 2021 · 235 citations
- Implicit Gradient RegularizationDavid G. T. Barrett, Benoit DherinICLR 2021 · 235 citations
Builds on3
- Fantastic Generalization Measures and Where to Find ThemYiding Jiang, Behnam Neyshabur, Hossein Mobahi, Dilip Krishnan et al.ICLR 2020 · 705 citations
- Understanding Why Neural Networks Generalize Well Through GSNR of ParametersJinlong Liu, Yunzhi Bai, Guoqing Jiang, Ting Chen et al.ICLR 2020 · 60 citations
- The Local Elasticity of Neural NetworksHangfeng He, Weijie J. SuICLR 2020 · 52 citations
Related papers
- A Loss Curvature Perspective on Training Instabilities of Deep Learning ModelsJustin Gilmer, Behrooz Ghorbani, Ankush Garg, Sneha Kudugunta et al.ICLR 2022 · 49 citations
- Catastrophic Fisher Explosion: Early Phase Fisher Matrix Impacts GeneralizationStanislaw Jastrzebski, Devansh Arpit, Oliver Åstrand, Giancarlo Kerg et al.ICML 2021 · 78 citations
- Direction Matters: On the Implicit Bias of Stochastic Gradient Descent with Moderate Learning RateJingfeng Wu, Difan Zou, Vladimir Braverman, Quanquan GuICLR 2021 · 18 citations
- Benign Oscillation of Stochastic Gradient Descent with Large Learning RateMiao Lu, Beining Wu, Xiaodong Yang, Difan ZouICLR 2024 · 9 citations
- Strength of Minibatch Noise in SGDLiu Ziyin, Kangqiao Liu, Takashi Mori, Masahito UedaICLR 2022 · 44 citations
