How Sparse Can We Prune A Deep Network: A Fundamental Limit Perspective
Qiaozhe Zhang, Ruijie Zhang, Jun Sun, Yingzhuang Liu
Abstract
Network pruning is a commonly used measure to alleviate the storage and computational burden of deep neural networks. However, the fundamental limit of network pruning is still lacking. To close the gap, in this work we'll take a first-principles approach, i.e. we'll directly impose the sparsity constraint on the loss function and leverage the framework of statistical dimension in convex geometry, thus enabling us to characterize the sharp phase transition point, which can be regarded as the fundamental limit of the pruning ratio. Through this limit, we're able to identify two key factors that determine the pruning ratio limit, namely, weight magnitude and network sharpness. Generally speaking, the flatter the loss landscape or the smaller the weight magnitude, the smaller pruning ratio. Moreover, we provide efficient countermeasures to address the challenges in the computation of the pruning limit, which mainly involves the accurate spectrum estimation of a large-scale and non-positive Hessian matrix. Moreover, through the lens of the pruning ratio threshold, we can also provide rigorous interpretations on several heuristics in existing pruning algorithms. Extensive experiments are performed which demonstrate that our theoretical pruning ratio threshold coincides very well with the experiments. All codes are available at: https://github.com/QiaozheZhang/Global-One-shot-Pruning
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers6
- LaX: Boosting Low-Rank Training of Foundation Models via Latent CrossingRuijie Zhang, Ziyue Liu, Zhengyang Wang, Zheng ZhangNeurIPS 2025 · 7 citations
- Differentiable Sparsity via -Gating: Simple and Versatile Structured PenalizationChris Kolb, Laetitia Frost, Bernd Bischl, David RügamerNeurIPS 2025 · 4 citations
- Cut Less, Fold More: Model Compression through the Lens of Projection GeometryOlga Saukh, Dong Wang, Haris Sikic, Yun Cheng et al.ICLR 2026 · 4 citations
- Determining Layer-wise Sparsity for Large Language Models Through a Theoretical PerspectiveWeizhong Huang, Yuxin Zhang, Xiawu Zheng, Fei Chao et al.ICML 2025
- CoLA: Compute-Efficient Pre-Training of LLMs via Low-Rank ActivationZiyue Liu, Ruijie Zhang, Zhengyang Wang, Mingsong Yan et al.EMNLP 2025
Builds on9
- Linear Mode Connectivity and the Lottery Ticket HypothesisJonathan Frankle, Gintare Karolina Dziugaite, Daniel M. Roy, Michael CarbinICML 2020 · 750 citations
- Relative Flatness and GeneralizationHenning Petzka, Michael Kamp, Linara Adilova, Cristian Sminchisescu et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 114 citations
- Sanity-Checking Pruning Methods: Random Tickets can Win the JackpotJingtong Su, Yihang Chen, Tianle Cai, Tianhao Wu et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 100 citations
- The Combinatorial Brain Surgeon: Pruning Weights That Cancel One Another in Neural NetworksXin Yu, Thiago Serra, Srikumar Ramalingam, Shandian ZheICML 2022 · 60 citations
- Rare Gems: Finding Lottery Tickets at InitializationKartik Sreenivasan, Jy-yong Sohn, Liu Yang, Matthew Grinde et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 52 citations
Related papers
- Learning Pruning-Friendly Networks via Frank-Wolfe: One-Shot, Any-Sparsity, And No RetrainingLu Miao, Xiaolong Luo, Tianlong Chen, Wuyang Chen et al.ICLR 2022 · 34 citations
- Neural Pruning via Growing RegularizationHuan Wang, Can Qin, Yulun Zhang, Yun FuICLR 2021 · 188 citations
- Automatic Network Pruning via Hilbert-Schmidt Independence Criterion Lasso under Information Bottleneck PrincipleSong Guo, Lei Zhang, Xiawu Zheng, Yan Wang et al.ICCV 2023 · 30 citations
- Automatic Channel Pruning with Hyper-parameter Search and Dynamic MaskingBaopu Li, Yanwen Fan, Zhihong Pan, Yuchen Bian et al.ACM MM 2021 · 3 citations
- A Probabilistic Approach to Neural Network PruningXin Qian, Diego KlabjanICML 2021 · 24 citations
