Automatic Network Pruning via Hilbert-Schmidt Independence Criterion Lasso under Information Bottleneck Principle
Song Guo, Lei Zhang, Xiawu Zheng, Yan Wang, Yuchao Li, Fei Chao, Chenglin Wu, Shengchuan Zhang, Rongrong Ji
Abstract
Most existing neural network pruning methods hand-crafted their importance criteria and structures to prune. This constructs heavy and unintended dependencies on heuristics and expert experience for both the objective and the parameters of the pruning approach. In this paper, we try to solve this problem by introducing a principled and unified framework based on Information Bottleneck (IB) theory, which further guides us to an automatic pruning approach. Specifically, we first formulate the channel pruning problem from an IB perspective, and then implement the IB principle by solving a Hilbert-Schmidt Independence Criterion (HSIC) Lasso problem under certain conditions. Based on the theoretical guidance, we then provide an automatic pruning scheme by searching for global penalty coefficients. Verified by extensive experiments, our method yields state-of-the-art performance on various benchmark networks and datasets. For example, with VGG-16, we achieve a 60%-FLOPs reduction by removing 76% of the parameters, with an improvement of 0.40% in top-1 accuracy on CIFAR-10. With ResNet-50, we achieve a 56%-FLOPs reduction by removing 50% of the parameters, with a small loss of 0.08% in the top-1 accuracy on ImageNet. The code is available at https://github.com/sunggo/APIB.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext e2250507-01dd-41a0-9faf-58c53d2bbacfCited by top-tier papers6
- Explaining Grokking and Information Bottleneck through Neural Collapse EmergenceKeitaro Sakamoto, Issei SatoICLR 2026 · 5 citations
- WINS: Winograd Structured Pruning for Fast Winograd ConvolutionCheonjun Park, Hyun Jae Oh, Mincheol Park, Hyunchan Moon et al.ICCV 2025 · 2 citations
- InfoQ: Mixed-Precision Quantization via Global Information FlowMehmet Emre Akbulut, Hazem Hesham Yousef Shalby, Fabrizio Pittorino, Manuel RoveriAAAI 2026 · 2 citations
- RepAn: Enhanced Annealing through Re-parameterizationXiang Fei, Xiawu Zheng, Yan Wang, Fei Chao et al.CVPR 2024
- IBMA: Information Bottleneck-Based Multimodal AlignmentYancheng Wang, Zeyu Dong, Dongfang Sun, Alvin Silva et al.ICML 2026
Builds on23
- Picking Winning Tickets Before Training by Preserving Gradient FlowChaoqi Wang, Guodong Zhang, Roger B. GrosseICLR 2020 · 743 citations
- Learning N: M Fine-grained Structured Sparse Neural Networks From ScratchAojun Zhou, Yukun Ma, Junnan Zhu, Jianbo Liu et al.ICLR 2021 · 301 citations
- SCOP: Scientific Control for Reliable Neural Network PruningYehui Tang, Yunhe Wang, Yixing Xu, Dacheng Tao et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 208 citations
- CHIP: CHannel Independence-based Pruning for Compact Neural NetworksYang Sui, Miao Yin, Yi Xie, Huy Phan et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 198 citations
- The HSIC Bottleneck: Deep Learning without Back-PropagationKurt Wan-Duo Ma, J. P. Lewis, W. Bastiaan KleijnAAAI 2020 · 180 citations
Related papers
- HRank: Filter Pruning Using High-Rank Feature MapMingbao Lin, Rongrong Ji, Yan Wang, Yichen Zhang et al.CVPR 2020
- Rethinking the Pruning Criteria for Convolutional Neural NetworkZhongzhan Huang, Wenqi Shao, Xinjiang Wang, Liang Lin et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 75 citations
- Accelerate CNN via Recursive Bayesian PruningYuefu Zhou, Ya Zhang, Yanfeng Wang, Qi TianICCV 2019 · 64 citations
- Convolutional Neural Network Pruning With Structural Redundancy ReductionZi Wang, Chengcheng Li, Xiangyang WangCVPR 2021
- DPFPS: Dynamic and Progressive Filter Pruning for Compressing Convolutional Neural Networks from ScratchXiaofeng Ruan, Yufan Liu, Bing Li, Chunfeng Yuan et al.AAAI 2021 · 49 citations
