How Language Formality in Security and Privacy Interfaces Impacts Intended Compliance
Jackson Stokes, Tal August, Robert A Marver, Alexei Czeskis, Franziska Roesner, Tadayoshi Kohno, Katharina Reinecke
Abstract
Strong end-user security practices benefit both the user and hosting platform, but it is not well understood how companies communicate with their users to encourage these practices. This paper explores whether web companies and their platforms use different levels of language formality in these communications and tests the hypothesis that higher language formality leads to users’ increased intention to comply. We contribute a dataset and systematic analysis of 1,817 English language strings in web security and privacy interfaces across 13 web platforms, showing strong variations in language. An online study with 512 participants further demonstrated that people perceive differences in the language formality across platforms and that a higher language formality is associated with higher self-reported intention to comply. Our findings suggest that formality can be an important factor in designing effective security and privacy prompts. We discuss implications of these results, including how to balance formality with platform language style. In addition to being the first piece of work to analyze language formality in user security, these findings provide valuable insights into how platforms can best communicate with users about account security.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext ca788e23-7d02-455c-8329-1d5abc4d92eaCited by top-tier papers2
- Know Your Audience: The benefits and pitfalls of generating plain language summaries beyond the "general" audienceTal August, Kyle Lo, Noah A. Smith, Katharina ReineckeCHI 2024 · 11 citations
- Understanding Chinese Internet Users' Perceptions of, and Online Platforms' Compliance with, the Personal Information Protection Law (PIPL)Morgana Mo Zhou, Zhiyan Qu, Jinhan Wan, Bo Wen et al.CSCW 2024 · 9 citations
Builds on4
- Augmenting Scientific Papers with Just-in-Time, Position-Sensitive Definitions of Terms and SymbolsAndrew Head, Kyle Lo, Dongyeop Kang, Raymond Fok et al.CHI 2021 · 91 citations
- Examining the Adoption and Abandonment of Security, Privacy, and Identity Theft Protection PracticesYixin Zou, Kevin A. Roundy, Acar Tamersoy, Saurabh Shintre et al.CHI 2020 · 73 citations
- Driving 2FA Adoption at Scale: Optimizing Two-Factor Authentication Notification Design PatternsMaximilian Golla, Grant Ho, Marika Lohmus, Monica Pulluri et al.USENIX Security 2021 · 48 citations
- Explain like I am a Scientist: The Linguistic Barriers of Entry to r/scienceTal August, Dallas Card, Gary Hsieh, Noah A. Smith et al.CHI 2020 · 22 citations
Related papers
- Listen to Developers! A Participatory Design Study on Security Warnings for Cryptographic APIsPeter Leo Gorski, Yasemin Acar, Luigi Lo Iacono, Sascha FahlCHI 2020 · 39 citations
- Online Privacy Heuristics that Predict Information DisclosureS. Shyam Sundar, Jinyoung Kim, Mary Beth Rosson, Maria D. MolinaCHI 2020 · 62 citations
- The Nuanced Nature of Trust and Privacy Control Adoption in the Context of GoogleEhsan Ul Haque, Mohammad Maifi Hasan Khan, Md Abdullah Al FahimCHI 2023 · 7 citations
- A Comparative Study of Dark Patterns Across Web and Mobile ModalitiesJohanna Gunawan, Amogh Pradeep, David R. Choffnes, Woodrow Hartzog et al.CSCW 2021 · 128 citations
- A Comprehensive Quality Evaluation of Security and Privacy Advice on the WebElissa M. Redmiles, Noel Warford, Amritha Jayanti, Aravind Koneru et al.USENIX Security 2020
