Know Your Audience: The benefits and pitfalls of generating plain language summaries beyond the "general" audience
Tal August, Kyle Lo, Noah A. Smith, Katharina Reinecke
Abstract
Language models (LMs) show promise as tools for communicating science to the general public by simplifying and summarizing complex language. Because models can be prompted to generate text for a specific audience (e.g., college-educated adults), LMs might be used to create multiple versions of plain language summaries for people with different familiarities of scientific topics. However, it is not clear what the benefits and pitfalls of adaptive plain language are. When is simplifying necessary, what are the costs in doing so, and do these costs differ for readers with different background knowledge? Through three within-subjects studies in which we surface summaries for different envisioned audiences to participants of different backgrounds, we found that while simpler text led to the best reading experience for readers with little to no familiarity in a topic, high familiarity readers tended to ignore certain details in overly plain summaries (e.g., study limitations). Our work provides methods and guidance on ways of adapting plain language summaries beyond the single “general” audience.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 82cbb6c3-8bb0-4aec-b063-252720f0bc82Cited by top-tier papers8
- How CO2STLY Is CHI? The Carbon Footprint of Generative AI in HCI Research and What We Should Do About ItNanna Inie, Jeanette Falk, Raghavendra SelvanCHI 2025 · 33 citations
- "Ronaldo's a poser!": How the Use of Generative AI Shapes Debates in Online ForumsYuhan Zeng, Yingxuan Shi, Xuehan Huang, Fiona Nah et al.CHI 2025 · 21 citations
- Audience in the Loop: Viewer Feedback-Driven Content Creation in Micro-drama Production on Social MediaGengchen Cao, Tianke He, Yixuan Liu, Ray LCCHI 2026 · 3 citations
- Steering AI-driven Personalization of Scientific Text for General AudiencesTaewook Kim, Dhruv Agarwal, Jordan Ackerman, Manaswi SahaCSCW 2025 · 2 citations
- TermSight: Making Service Contracts ApproachableZiheng Huang, Tal August, Hari SundaramCHI 2026 · 1 citation
Builds on16
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTTianyi Zhang, Varsha Kishore, Felix Wu, Kilian Q. Weinberger et al.ICLR 2020 · 8,443 citations
- Social Simulacra: Creating Populated Prototypes for Social Computing SystemsJoon Sung Park, Lindsay Popowski, Carrie J. Cai, Meredith Ringel Morris et al.UIST 2022 · 192 citations
- Automated Lay Language Summarization of Biomedical Scientific ReviewsYue Guo, Wei Qiu, Yizhong Wang, Trevor CohenAAAI 2021 · 100 citations
- Augmenting Scientific Papers with Just-in-Time, Position-Sensitive Definitions of Terms and SymbolsAndrew Head, Kyle Lo, Dongyeop Kang, Raymond Fok et al.CHI 2021 · 91 citations
Related papers
- No Reader Left Behind: Multi-Agent Summaries Everyone Can UnderstandJimin Jung, MyoungJin Kim, Jaehyung Seo, Heuiseok LimACL 2026
- Evaluating the Evaluators: Are readability metrics good measures of readability?Isabel Cachola, Daniel Khashabi, Mark DredzeEMNLP 2025 · 1 citation
- On the Automatic Generation and Simplification of Children's StoriesMaria R. Valentini, Jennifer Weber, Jesus Salcido, Téa Wright et al.EMNLP 2023 · 7 citations
- Controlling Pre-trained Language Models for Grade-Specific Text SimplificationSweta Agrawal, Marine CarpuatEMNLP 2023 · 5 citations
- LLM or Human? Perceptions of Trust and Quality in Research SummariesNil-Jana Akpinar, Sandeep Avula, Chia-Jung Lee, Brandon Dang et al.CHI 2026 · 2 citations
