"Ronaldo's a poser!": How the Use of Generative AI Shapes Debates in Online Forums
Yuhan Zeng, Yingxuan Shi, Xuehan Huang, Fiona Nah, Ray LC
Abstract
Online debates can enhance critical thinking but may escalate into hostile attacks. As humans are increasingly reliant on Generative AI (GenAI) in writing tasks, we need to understand how people utilize GenAI in online debates. To examine the patterns of writing behavior while making arguments with GenAI, we created an online forum for soccer fans to engage in turn-based and free debates in a post format with the assistance of ChatGPT, arguing on the topic of "Messi vs Ronaldo". After 13 sessions of two-part study and semi-structured interviews with 39 participants, we conducted content and thematic analyses to integrate insights from interview transcripts, ChatGPT records, and forum posts. We found that participants prompted ChatGPT for aggressive responses, created posts with similar content and logical fallacies, and sacrificed the use of ChatGPT for better human-human communication. This work uncovers how polarized forum members work with GenAI to engage in debates online.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers7
- "Not Human, Funnier": How Machine Identity Shapes Humor Perception in Online AI Stand-up ComedyXuehan Huang, Canwen Wang, Yifei Hao, Daijin Yang et al.CHI 2026 · 6 citations
- Hear You in Silence: Designing for Active Listening in Human Interaction with Conversational Agents Using Context-Aware PacingZhihan Jiang, Qianhui Chen, Chu Zhang, Yanheng Li et al.CHI 2026 · 5 citations
- Tell Me What I Missed: Interacting with GPT during Recalling of One-Time Witnessed EventsSuifang Zhou, Qi Gong, Ximing Shen, Ray LCCHI 2026 · 5 citations
- Audience in the Loop: Viewer Feedback-Driven Content Creation in Micro-drama Production on Social MediaGengchen Cao, Tianke He, Yixuan Liu, Ray LCCHI 2026 · 3 citations
- Talking About Brainrot: Youth Engagement with AI-Generated Content and the Dynamics of Intergenerational CommunicationGianluca Schiavo, Margherita AndraoCHI 2026 · 2 citations
Builds on25
- Why Johnny Can't Prompt: How Non-AI Experts Try (and Fail) to Design LLM PromptsJ. D. Zamfirescu-Pereira, Richmond Y. Wong, Bjoern Hartmann, Qian YangCHI 2023 · 892 citations
- Co-Writing with Opinionated Language Models Affects Users' ViewsMaurice Jakesch, Advait Bhat, Daniel Buschek, Lior Zalmanson et al.CHI 2023 · 249 citations
- Co-Writing Screenplays and Theatre Scripts with Language Models: Evaluation by Industry ProfessionalsPiotr Mirowski, Kory W. Mathewson, Jaylen Pittman, Richard EvansCHI 2023 · 235 citations
- More Kawaii than a Real-Person Live Streamer: Understanding How the Otaku Community Engages with and Perceives Virtual YouTubersZhicong Lu, Chenxinran Shen, Jiannan Li, Hong Shen et al.CHI 2021 · 135 citations
- A Design Space for Intelligent and Interactive Writing AssistantsMina Lee, Katy Ilonka Gero, John Joon Young Chung, Simon Buckingham Shum et al.CHI 2024 · 133 citations
Related papers
- How Do Programming Students Use Generative AI?Christian Rahe, Walid MaalejFSE 2025 · 12 citations
- Breaking Barriers or Building Dependency? Exploring Team-LLM Collaboration in AI-infused Classroom DebateZihan Zhang, Black Sun, Pengcheng AnCHI 2025 · 24 citations
- The Generative AI Divide: A Descriptive Analysis of Heterogeneous Adaptation Among Knowledge ContributorsJaeyoon Song, Arman Vossoughi, Hongzun Zhang, Dokyun LeeCSCW 2026
- CoAuthor: Designing a Human-AI Collaborative Writing Dataset for Exploring Language Model CapabilitiesMina Lee, Percy Liang, Qian YangCHI 2022 · 340 citations
- GraphNLI: A Graph-based Natural Language Inference Model for Polarity Prediction in Online DebatesVibhor Agarwal, Sagar Joglekar, Anthony P. Young, Nishanth SastryWWW 2022 · 23 citations
