How CO2STLY Is CHI? The Carbon Footprint of Generative AI in HCI Research and What We Should Do About It
Nanna Inie, Jeanette Falk, Raghavendra Selvan
Abstract
The energy cost of developing and deploying Generative AI (GenAI) models has exploded with their mass adoption, as has the ensuing carbon emissions. The climate impact of this is currently unknown. In Human-Computer Interaction, GenAI models are rarely trained but often used. Based on detailed review of 282 papers, we estimate this footprint from energy consumption of the total use of GenAI for CHI 2024 research as between 10,769.63 and 10,925.12 kg CO 2 e -equal to driving a car for more than 100,000 km. We show that in CHI research, GenAI is most often used for Prototyping, Evaluation & User studies, and that Data Collection and Fine-tuning models incurs the highest 𝐶𝑂 2 st. 1 We find that CHI submissions are unlikely to report GenAI use transparently, which makes precise calculations difficult. By measuring the usage of a subset of the papers on local hardware, we obtain estimations of the energy consumption and carbon footprint. Based on this evidence, we discuss and demonstrate ways to mitigate the issues of GenAI carbon footprint and lack of transparency.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 4176745c-039f-46ad-a9d6-0272642684d8Cited by top-tier papers3
- Entangled Life and Code: A Computational Design Taxonomy for Synergistic Bio-Digital Systems✱Zoë Breed, Elvin Karana, Alessandro Bozzon, Katherine W. SongCHI 2026 · 2 citations
- Futuring Social Assemblages: How Enmeshing AIs into Social Life Challenges the Individual and the InterpersonalLingqing Wang, Yingting Gao, Chidimma Lois Anyi, Ashok K. GoelCHI 2026 · 2 citations
- Hugging Carbon: Quantifying the Training Carbon Emissions of AI Models at ScaleXinlei Wang, Ruibo Ming, Jing Qiu, Junhua Zhao et al.ICML 2026
Builds on195
- Robust Speech Recognition via Large-Scale Weak SupervisionAlec Radford, Jong Wook Kim, Tao Xu, Greg Brockman et al.ICML 2023 · 6,966 citations
- BLIP: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training for Unified Vision-Language Understanding and GenerationJunnan Li, Dongxu Li, Caiming Xiong, Steven C. H. HoiICML 2022 · 6,549 citations
- SDXL: Improving Latent Diffusion Models for High-Resolution Image SynthesisDustin Podell, Zion English, Kyle Lacey, Andreas Blattmann et al.ICLR 2024 · 4,569 citations
- Simple and Controllable Music GenerationJade Copet, Felix Kreuk, Itai Gat, Tal Remez et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 843 citations
- One-2-3-45: Any Single Image to 3D Mesh in 45 Seconds without Per-Shape OptimizationMinghua Liu, Chao Xu, Haian Jin, Linghao Chen et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 755 citations
Related papers
- Holistically Evaluating the Environmental Impact of Creating Language ModelsJacob Morrison, Clara Na, Jared Fernandez, Tim Dettmers et al.ICLR 2025
- LLMCarbon: Modeling the End-to-End Carbon Footprint of Large Language ModelsAhmad Faiz, Sotaro Kaneda, Ruhan Wang, Rita Chukwunyere Osi et al.ICLR 2024 · 129 citations
- Monitoring AI-Modified Content at Scale: A Case Study on the Impact of ChatGPT on AI Conference Peer ReviewsWeixin Liang, Zachary Izzo, Yaohui Zhang, Haley Lepp et al.ICML 2024 · 213 citations
- Understanding the LLM-ification of CHI: Unpacking the Impact of LLMs at CHI through a Systematic Literature ReviewRock Yuren Pang, Hope Schroeder, Kynnedy Simone Smith, Solon Barocas et al.CHI 2025 · 51 citations
- Towards Climate Awareness in NLP ResearchDaniel Hershcovich, Nicolas Webersinke, Mathias Kraus, Julia Anna Bingler et al.EMNLP 2022 · 32 citations
