Listen to Developers! A Participatory Design Study on Security Warnings for Cryptographic APIs
Peter Leo Gorski, Yasemin Acar, Luigi Lo Iacono, Sascha Fahl
Abstract
The positive effect of security information communicated to developers through API warnings has been established. However, current prototypical designs are based on security warnings for end-users. To improve security feedback for developers, we conducted a participatory design study with 25 professional software developers in focus groups. We identify which security information is considered helpful in avoiding insecure cryptographic API use during development. Concerning console messages, participants suggested five core elements, namely message classification, title message, code location, link to detailed external resources, and color. Design guidelines for end-user warnings are only partially suitable in this context. Participants emphasized the importance of tailoring the detail and content of security information to the context. Console warnings call for concise communication; further information needs to be linked externally. Therefore, security feedback should transcend tools and should be adjustable by software developers across development tools, considering the work context and developer needs.
Ask about this paper
Ask your agent about it.
Lune has read the top-tier papers around this one, so every answer names the papers it rests on.
Your agent calls
Lunesearch_papers
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers get 5c233b34-c749-423b-b7e7-65ad609c74b6Cited by top-tier papers15
- Contestability For Content ModerationKristen Vaccaro, Ziang Xiao, Kevin Hamilton, Karrie KarahaliosCSCW 2021 · 77 citations
- "It's Stored, Hopefully, on an Encrypted Server": Mitigating Users' Misconceptions About FIDO2 Biometric WebAuthnLeona Lassak, Annika Hildebrandt, Maximilian Golla, Blase UrUSENIX Security 2021 · 48 citations
- "False negative - that one is going to kill you": Understanding Industry Perspectives of Static Analysis based Security TestingAmit Seal Ami, Kevin Moran, Denys Poshyvanyk, Adwait NadkarniS&P 2024 · 40 citations
- Exploring Design and Governance Challenges in the Development of Privacy-Preserving ComputationNitin Agrawal, Reuben Binns, Max Van Kleek, Kim Laine et al.CHI 2021 · 37 citations
- Security Notifications in Static Analysis Tools: Developers' Attitudes, Comprehension, and Ability to Act on ThemMohammad Tahaei, Kami Vaniea, Konstantin Beznosov, Maria K. WoltersCHI 2021 · 35 citations
Related papers
- Comparing the Usability of Cryptographic APIsYasemin Acar, Michael Backes, Sascha Fahl, Simson L. Garfinkel et al.S&P 2017 · 261 citations
- "I'm Pretty Expert and I Still Screw It Up": Qualitative Insights into Experiences and Challenges of Designing and Implementing Cryptographic Library APIsJuliane Schmüser, Philip Klostermeyer, Kay Friedrich, Sascha FahlS&P 2025
- One size does not fit all: a grounded theory and online survey study of developer preferences for security warning typesAnastasia Danilova, Alena Naiakshina, Matthew SmithICSE 2020 · 24 citations
- "That's my perspective from 30 years of doing this": An Interview Study on Practices, Experiences, and Challenges of Updating Cryptographic CodeAlexander Krause, Harjot Kaur, Jan H. Klemmer, Oliver Wiese et al.USENIX Security 2025
- Analyzing the Use of Public and In-house Secure Development Guidelines in U.S. and Japanese IndustriesFumihiro Kanei, Ayako Akiyama Hasegawa, Eitaro Shioji, Mitsuaki AkiyamaCHI 2023 · 4 citations
