Analyzing the Use of Public and In-house Secure Development Guidelines in U.S. and Japanese Industries
Fumihiro Kanei, Ayako Akiyama Hasegawa, Eitaro Shioji, Mitsuaki Akiyama
Abstract
Secure development guidelines contribute to improving software security from the development stage by making developers aware of the risks to be assumed, the necessary security countermeasures, and how to implement them. In this study, we investigated the actual utilization of guidelines and their usability in the industry through a survey of software development professionals in the U.S. and Japan (N=396 in the U.S. and N=474 in Japan). Our quantitative analysis revealed that “in-house” guidelines not examined in most existing studies are in fact widely utilized in the industry and also clarified how they are related to the use of public guidelines. In addition, we found that the practices for implementing guidelines recommended by existing studies are difficult for software development professionals with certain attributes, e.g., those who are working on small projects. The findings demonstrate the need for lightweight recommended practices taking into account organizational issues at industrial development sites that are easy for developers to implement.
Ask about this paper
Ask your agent about it.
Lune has read the top-tier papers around this one, so every answer names the papers it rests on.
Your agent calls
Lunesearch_papers
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers get 5afe60e2-cf7c-4b68-a77c-0a84d82322a7Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itRelated papers
- How Does Usable Security (Not) End Up in Software Products? Results From a Qualitative Interview StudyMarco Gutfleisch, Jan H. Klemmer, Niklas Busch, Yasemin Acar et al.S&P 2022 · 51 citations
- Measuring Secure Coding Practice and Culture: A Finger Pointing at the Moon is not the MoonIta Ryan, Utz Roedig, Klaas-Jan StolICSE 2023 · 13 citations
- Software security during modern code review: the developer's perspectiveLarissa Braz, Alberto BacchelliFSE 2022 · 28 citations
- On the Naming of Methods: A Survey of Professional DevelopersReem S. Alsuhaibani, Christian D. Newman, Michael John Decker, Michael L. Collard et al.ICSE 2021 · 3 citations
- "Threat modeling is very formal, it's very technical, and also very hard to do correctly": Investigating Threat Modeling Practices in Open-Source Software ProjectsHarjot Kaur, Carson Powers, Ronald E. Thompson III, Sascha Fahl et al.USENIX Security 2025
