Lune

ICSE2021Top-tier venue

On the Naming of Methods: A Survey of Professional Developers

Reem S. Alsuhaibani, Christian D. Newman, Michael John Decker, Michael L. Collard, Jonathan I. Maletic

2021Year
3Citations
4Top-tier citations

Abstract

This paper describes the results of a large (+1100 responses) survey of professional software developers concerning standards for naming source code methods. The various standards for source code method names are derived from and supported in the software engineering literature. The goal of the survey is to determine if there is a general consensus among developers that the standards are accepted and used in practice. Additionally, the paper examines factors such as years of experience and programming language knowledge in the context of survey responses. The survey results show that participants very much agree about the importance of various standards and how they apply to names and that years of experience and the programming language has almost no effect on their responses. The results imply that the given standards are both valid and to a large degree complete. The work provides a foundation for automated method name assessment during development and code reviews.

Ask about this paper

Your agent reads all of it.

Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.

Questions to start from

Your agent calls

Luneget_paper_fulltext

Ask in Lune

Free to start. No credit card required.

lune papers fulltext e9ed35d2-bf62-4ff1-8f92-2eaa66e7848b

Cited by top-tier papers4

Ask how each one uses it

Related papers

Dusk over the sea between two cliffs drawn in fine vertical lines