Lune

CSCW2021Top-tier venue

Contestability For Content Moderation

Kristen Vaccaro, Ziang Xiao, Kevin Hamilton, Karrie Karahalios

2021Year
77Citations
19Top-tier citations

Abstract

Content moderation systems for social media have had numerous issues of bias, in terms of race, gender, and ability among many others. One proposal for addressing such issues in automated decision making is by designing for contestability, whereby users can shape and influence how decisions are made. In this study, we conduct a series of participatory design workshops with participants from communities that have experienced problems with social media content moderation in the past. Together with participants, we explore the idea of designing for contestability in content moderation and find that users' designs suggest three fruitful, practical avenues: adding representation, improving communication, and designing with compassion. We conclude with design recommendations drawn from participants' proposals, and reflect on the challenges that remain.

CCS Concepts: • Human-centered computing → Human computer interaction (HCI); Social media.

Ask about this paper

Your agent reads all of it.

Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.

Questions to start from

Your agent calls

Luneget_paper_fulltext

Ask in Lune

Free to start. No credit card required.

lune papers fulltext 808e0849-980b-4548-847e-31cab5d8a1bf

Cited by top-tier papers19

Ask how each one uses it

Builds on9

Related papers

Dusk over the sea between two cliffs drawn in fine vertical lines