Contestability For Content Moderation
Kristen Vaccaro, Ziang Xiao, Kevin Hamilton, Karrie Karahalios
Abstract
Content moderation systems for social media have had numerous issues of bias, in terms of race, gender, and ability among many others. One proposal for addressing such issues in automated decision making is by designing for contestability, whereby users can shape and influence how decisions are made. In this study, we conduct a series of participatory design workshops with participants from communities that have experienced problems with social media content moderation in the past. Together with participants, we explore the idea of designing for contestability in content moderation and find that users' designs suggest three fruitful, practical avenues: adding representation, improving communication, and designing with compassion. We conclude with design recommendations drawn from participants' proposals, and reflect on the challenges that remain.
CCS Concepts: • Human-centered computing → Human computer interaction (HCI); Social media.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 808e0849-980b-4548-847e-31cab5d8a1bfCited by top-tier papers19
- Personalizing Content Moderation on Social Media: User Perspectives on Moderation Choices, Interface Design, and LaborShagun Jhaver, Alice Qian Zhang, Quan Ze Chen, Nikhila Natarajan et al.CSCW 2023 · 87 citations
- Designing Word Filter Tools for Creator-led Comment ModerationShagun Jhaver, Quan Ze Chen, Detlef Knauss, Amy X. ZhangCHI 2022 · 70 citations
- Comparing the Perceived Legitimacy of Content Moderation Processes: Contractors, Algorithms, Expert Panels, and Digital JuriesChristina A. Pan, Sahil Yakhmi, Tara P. Iyer, Evan Strasnick et al.CSCW 2022 · 68 citations
- Decolonizing Content Moderation: Does Uniform Global Community Standard Resemble Utopian Equality or Western Power Hegemony?Farhana Shahid, Aditya VashisthaCHI 2023 · 63 citations
- Cruising Queer HCI on the DL: A Literature Review of LGBTQ+ People in HCIJordan Taylor, Ellen Simpson, Anh-Ton Tran, Jed R. Brubaker et al.CHI 2024 · 55 citations
Builds on9
- Questioning the AI: Informing Design Practices for Explainable AI User ExperiencesQ. Vera Liao, Daniel M. Gruen, Sarah MillerCHI 2020 · 758 citations
- Designing Trans Technology: Defining Challenges and Envisioning Community-Centered SolutionsOliver L. Haimson, Dykee Gorrell, Denny L. Starks, Zu WeingerCHI 2020 · 138 citations
- Digital Juries: A Civics-Oriented Approach to Platform GovernanceJenny Fan, Amy X. ZhangCHI 2020 · 90 citations
- Conformity of Eating Disorders through Content ModerationJessica L. Feuston, Alex S. Taylor, Anne Marie PiperCSCW 2020 · 82 citations
- "At the End of the Day Facebook Does What ItWants": How Users Experience Contesting Algorithmic Content ModerationKristen Vaccaro, Christian Sandvig, Karrie KarahaliosCSCW 2020 · 79 citations
Related papers
- Conceptualising Contestability: Perspectives on Contesting Algorithmic DecisionsHenrietta Lyons, Eduardo Velloso, Tim MillerCSCW 2021 · 3 citations
- Contestable Camera Cars: A Speculative Design Exploration of Public AI That Is Open and Responsive to DisputeKars Alfrink, Ianus Keller, Neelke Doorn, Gerd KortuemCHI 2023 · 44 citations
- Exploring Autistic Coping through Participatory DesignBelén Barros Pena, John Vines, Martine Van Driel, Nelya KoteykoCSCW 2025 · 1 citation
- Beyond Initial Removal: Lasting Impacts of Discriminatory Content Moderation to Marginalized Creators on InstagramYim Register, Izzi Grasso, Lauren N. Weingarten, Lilith Fury et al.CSCW 2024 · 14 citations
- Designing For MicroaggressionsLu Sun, Yutong Chen, Binghong Li, Ruoxuan Li et al.CSCW 2025 · 2 citations
