Dynamic Evaluation of Large Language Models by Meta Probing Agents
Kaijie Zhu, Jindong Wang, Qinlin Zhao, Ruochen Xu, Xing Xie
Abstract
Evaluation of large language models (LLMs) has raised great concerns in the community due to the issue of data contamination. Existing work designed evaluation protocols using well-defined algorithms for specific tasks, which cannot be easily extended to diverse scenarios. Moreover, current evaluation benchmarks can only provide the overall benchmark results and cannot support a fine-grained and multifaceted analysis of LLMs' abilities. In this paper, we propose meta probing agents (MPA), a general dynamic evaluation protocol inspired by psychometrics to evaluate LLMs. MPA is the key component of DyVal 2, which naturally extends the previous DyVal . MPA designs the probing and judging agents to automatically transform an original evaluation problem into a new one following psychometric theory on three basic cognitive abilities: language understanding, problem solving, and domain knowledge. These basic abilities are also dynamically configurable, allowing multifaceted analysis. We conducted extensive evaluations using MPA and found that most LLMs achieve poorer performance, indicating room for improvement. Our multifaceted analysis demonstrated the strong correlation between the basic abilities and an implicit Matthew effect on model size, i.e., larger models possess stronger correlations of the abilities. MPA can also be used as a data augmentation approach to enhance LLMs. Code is available at: https://github.com/microsoft/promptbench.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext c66e2bb8-89ad-4c2c-b0cb-f262d9ddb308Cited by top-tier papers18
- AgentReview: Exploring Peer Review Dynamics with LLM AgentsYiqiao Jin, Qinlin Zhao, Yiyang Wang, Hao Chen et al.EMNLP 2024 · 24 citations
- Adaptive Distraction: Probing LLM Contextual Robustness with Automated Tree SearchYanbo Wang, Zixiang Xu, Yue Huang, Chujie Gao et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 11 citations
- Behavior Injection: Preparing Language Models for Reinforcement LearningZhepeng Cen, Yihang Yao, William Han, Zuxin Liu et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 9 citations
- LLM-Powered Benchmark Factory: Reliable, Generic, and EfficientPeiwen Yuan, Shaoxiong Feng, Yiwei Li, Xinglin Wang et al.ACL 2026 · 8 citations
- ChemOrch: Empowering LLMs with Chemical Intelligence via Groundbreaking Synthetic InstructionsYue Huang, Zhengzhe Jiang, Xiaonan Luo, Kehan Guo et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 5 citations
Builds on17
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- Measuring Massive Multitask Language UnderstandingDan Hendrycks, Collin Burns, Steven Basart, Andy Zou et al.ICLR 2021 · 7,905 citations
- AlpacaFarm: A Simulation Framework for Methods that Learn from Human FeedbackYann Dubois, Chen Xuechen Li, Rohan Taori, Tianyi Zhang et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 948 citations
- Are Emergent Abilities of Large Language Models a Mirage?Rylan Schaeffer, Brando Miranda, Sanmi KoyejoNeurIPS 2023 · 796 citations
Related papers
- DyVal: Dynamic Evaluation of Large Language Models for Reasoning TasksKaijie Zhu, Jiaao Chen, Jindong Wang, Neil Zhenqiang Gong et al.ICLR 2024 · 92 citations
- CogMath: Assessing LLMs' Authentic Mathematical Ability from a Human Cognitive PerspectiveJiayu Liu, Zhenya Huang, Wei Dai, Cheng Cheng et al.ICML 2025
- DMT-RoleBench: A Dynamic Multi-Turn Dialogue Based Benchmark for Role-Playing Evaluation of Large Language Model and AgentDingbo Yuan, Yipeng Chen, Guodong Liu, Chenchen Li et al.AAAI 2025 · 6 citations
- On the Humanity of Conversational AI: Evaluating the Psychological Portrayal of LLMsJen-tse Huang, Wenxuan Wang, Eric John Li, Man Ho Lam et al.ICLR 2024 · 85 citations
- F-Eval: Asssessing Fundamental Abilities with Refined Evaluation MethodsYu Sun, Keyuchen Keyuchen, Shujie Wang, Peiji Li et al.ACL 2024
