Behavior Injection: Preparing Language Models for Reinforcement Learning
Zhepeng Cen, Yihang Yao, William Han, Zuxin Liu, Ding Zhao
Abstract
Reinforcement learning (RL) has emerged as a powerful post-training technique to incentivize the reasoning ability of large language models (LLMs). However, LLMs can respond very inconsistently to RL finetuning: some show substantial performance gains, while others plateau or even degrade. To understand this divergence, we analyze the per-step influence of the RL objective and identify two key conditions for effective post-training: (1) RL-informative rollout accuracy, and (2) strong data co-influence, which quantifies how much the training data affects performance on other samples. Guided by these insights, we propose behavior injection, a task-agnostic data augmentation scheme applied prior to RL. Behavior injection enriches the supervised finetuning (SFT) data by seeding exploratory and exploitative behaviors, effectively making the model more RLready. We evaluate our method across two reasoning benchmarks with multiple base models. The results demonstrate that our theoretically motivated augmentation can significantly increase the performance gain from RL over the pre-RL model. Website: https://bridge-llm-reasoning.github.io/ . Our key insights stem from two perspectives: ( 1 ) Analysis of the RL learning objective: we identify two critical factors that influence model improvement during RL tuning: rollout accuracy and the data co-influence coefficient, which quantifies how strongly RL training data affects generalization to the target domain. (2) Desirable behaviors for RL: while exploration and exploitation are central in low-dimensional RL [31], they are often underexplored in the context of LLM post-training. Motivated by these findings, we introduce BRIDGE (BehavioR Injection Data auGmEntation), a data-centric augmentation strategy applied during the SFT stage. BRIDGE injects desired behaviors into the model before RL, enabling it to generate more informative trajectories during RL rollout and leading to greater final performance improvements. Our contributions are summarized as: 1. In-depth analysis of LLM reinforcement learning. We provide a detailed examination of the RL training process, highlighting two key factors that drive learning efficiency: rollout accuracy distribution and the data co-influence coefficient. Introduction of the BRIDGE augmentation algorithm. We propose BRIDGE, which prepares the model for RL by explicitly injecting exploration and exploitation behaviors during SFT. 3. Comprehensive empirical evaluation. We evaluate BRIDGE across diverse tasks from iGSM and PromptBench. Extensive experiments and ablation studies demonstrate that BRIDGE enhances data co-influence and significantly improves performance in the RL stage. Related Work RL-based post-training for LLMs. Reinforcement learning (RL) has become a central posttraining approach for aligning and extending large language models. Large-scale efforts such as and DeepSeek-R1 [33] illustrated the gains obtainable from reward optimization on general-purpose models. Since then, RL fine-tuning has been pushed into a variety of domainspecialized settings. In mathematics, verifier-guided or programmatically graded rewards help models master challenging problems [34, 35, 24, 36, 37, 38] , while logic benchmarks likewise benefit from RL-driven reasoning refinement [39, 40] . Interactive agents leverage RL for textual tool use and multistep planning [41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46] , mobile-app control [25] , device manipulation [47, 48] , and web navigation [49]. Additional applications include medical visual QA [50], software-engineering assistance [51], social reasoning [52], and tool-centric instruction following [53]. Analysis of LLM finetuning. To understand how model performance changes during finetuning, researchers study SFT learning dynamics of LLM [54] in terms of data influence [55, 56] or likelihood analysis [57, 58] . In the context of RL finetuning, OpenAI o1 [32] showed that RL significantly improve reasoning by encouraging the generation of longer CoT. Subsequent studies [59, 60, 61, 62] validate this effect and show that RL enables inference-time scaling by favoring more expressive reasoning traces. This finding is aligned with theoretical analyses that characterize the expressivity of CoT [63, 64, 65, 66] . Furthermore, researchers [67, 68, 69] observe that RL fine-tuning often amplifies behaviors already accessible in the base model rather than introducing entirely new ones, which are crucial cognitive operations to performance growth in RL [70] . Distinct from these works, we investigate the tuning dynamics by RL learning objective, and we identify behaviors from the perspective of exploration and exploitation to prepare models for RL tuning.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext fec8f5a4-828f-4aeb-aeef-8314033540d2Cited by top-tier papers4
- Quagmires in SFT-RL Post-Training: When High SFT Scores Mislead and What to Use InsteadFeiyang Kang, Michael Kuchnik, Karthik Padthe, Marin Vlastelica et al.ICLR 2026 · 27 citations
- Webscale-RL: Automated Data Pipeline for Scaling RL Data to Pretraining LevelsZhepeng Cen, Haolin Chen, Shiyu Wang, Zuxin Liu et al.ICLR 2026 · 7 citations
- Tailored Primitive Initialization is the Secret Key to Reinforcement LearningYihang Yao, Guangtao Zeng, Raina Wu, Yang Zhang et al.ACL 2026 · 1 citation
- Pushing Forward Pareto Frontiers of Proactive Agents with Behavioral Agentic OptimizationYihang Yao, Zhepeng Cen, Haohong Lin, Shiqi Liu et al.ICML 2026
Builds on39
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language ModelsEdward J. Hu, Yelong Shen, Phillip Wallis, Zeyuan Allen-Zhu et al.ICLR 2022 · 18,833 citations
- Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward ModelRafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D. Manning et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 10,924 citations
Related papers
- Beyond Two-Stage Training: Cooperative SFT and RL for LLM ReasoningLiang Chen, Xueting Han, Li Shen, Jing Bai et al.ICML 2026 · 24 citations
- Why Does Reinforcement Learning Generalize? A Feature-Level Mechanistic Study of Post-Training in Large Language ModelsDan Shi, Zhuowen Han, Simon Ostermann, Renren Jin et al.ACL 2026 · 1 citation
- On the Interplay of Pre-Training, Mid-Training, and RL on Reasoning Language ModelsCharlie Zhang, Graham Neubig, Xiang YueICML 2026 · 58 citations
- Theoretical Perspectives on Data Quality and Synergistic Effects in Pre- and Post-Training Reasoning ModelsAdel Javanmard, Baharan Mirzasoleiman, Vahab MirrokniICML 2026 · 4 citations
- UFT: Unifying Supervised and Reinforcement Fine-TuningMingyang Liu, Gabriele Farina, Asuman OzdaglarNeurIPS 2025 · 61 citations
