DyVal: Dynamic Evaluation of Large Language Models for Reasoning Tasks
Kaijie Zhu, Jiaao Chen, Jindong Wang, Neil Zhenqiang Gong, Diyi Yang, Xing Xie
Abstract
Large language models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable performance in various evaluation benchmarks. However, concerns are raised about potential data contamination in their considerable volume of training corpus. Moreover, the static nature and fixed complexity of current benchmarks may inadequately gauge the advancing capabilities of LLMs. In this paper, we introduce DYVAL, a general and flexible protocol for dynamic evaluation of LLMs. Based on our framework, we build graph-informed DYVAL by leveraging the structural advantage of directed acyclic graphs to dynamically generate evaluation samples with controllable complexities. DYVAL generates challenging evaluation sets on reasoning tasks including mathematics, logical reasoning, and algorithm problems. We evaluate various LLMs ranging from Flan-T5-large to GPT-3.5-Turbo and GPT-4. Experiments show that LLMs perform worse in DYVAL-generated evaluation samples with different complexities, highlighting the significance of dynamic evaluation. We also analyze the failure cases and results of different prompting methods. Moreover, DYVAL-generated samples are not only evaluation sets, but also helpful data for fine-tuning to improve the performance of LLMs on existing benchmarks. We hope that DYVAL can shed light on future evaluation research of LLMs. Code is available at: https://github.com/microsoft/promptbench .
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 0e47301b-05f3-4819-932d-b6d3606dc17aCited by top-tier papers33
- Enhancing Reasoning Capabilities of LLMs via Principled Synthetic Logic CorpusTerufumi Morishita, Gaku Morio, Atsuki Yamaguchi, Yasuhiro SogawaNeurIPS 2024 · 60 citations
- Personalized Safety in LLMs: A Benchmark and A Planning-Based Agent ApproachYuchen Wu, Edward Sun, Kaijie Zhu, Jianxun Lian et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 20 citations
- NetArena: Dynamic Benchmarks for AI Agents in Network AutomationYajie Zhou, Jiajun Ruan, Eric S. Wang, Sadjad Fouladi et al.ICLR 2026 · 17 citations
- Co-occurrence is not Factual Association in Language ModelsXiao Zhang, Miao Li, Ji WuNeurIPS 2024 · 15 citations
- Local Success Does Not Compose: Benchmarking Large Language Models for Compositional Formal VerificationXu Xu, Xin Li, Xingwei Qu, Jie Fu et al.ICLR 2026 · 9 citations
Builds on26
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language ModelsEdward J. Hu, Yelong Shen, Phillip Wallis, Zeyuan Allen-Zhu et al.ICLR 2022 · 18,833 citations
- Measuring Massive Multitask Language UnderstandingDan Hendrycks, Collin Burns, Steven Basart, Andy Zou et al.ICLR 2021 · 7,905 citations
- Is BERT Really Robust? A Strong Baseline for Natural Language Attack on Text Classification and EntailmentDi Jin, Zhijing Jin, Joey Tianyi Zhou, Peter SzolovitsAAAI 2020 · 1,333 citations
Related papers
- DARG: Dynamic Evaluation of Large Language Models via Adaptive Reasoning GraphZhehao Zhang, Jiaao Chen, Diyi YangNeurIPS 2024 · 42 citations
- Dynamic Evaluation of Large Language Models by Meta Probing AgentsKaijie Zhu, Jindong Wang, Qinlin Zhao, Ruochen Xu et al.ICML 2024 · 65 citations
- JudgeBoard: Benchmarking and Enhancing Small Language Models for Reasoning EvaluationZhenyu Bi, Gaurav Srivastava, Yang Li, Swastik Roy et al.AAAI 2026
- Evaluating Cognitive Maps and Planning in Large Language Models with CogEvalIda Momennejad, Hosein Hasanbeig, Felipe Vieira Frujeri, Hiteshi Sharma et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 114 citations
- Do Language Models Have a Common Sense regarding Time? Revisiting Temporal Commonsense Reasoning in the Era of Large Language ModelsRaghav Jain, Daivik Sojitra, Arkadeep Acharya, Sriparna Saha et al.EMNLP 2023 · 17 citations
