F-Eval: Asssessing Fundamental Abilities with Refined Evaluation Methods
Yu Sun, Keyuchen Keyuchen, Shujie Wang, Peiji Li, Qipeng Guo, Hang Yan, Xipeng Qiu, Xuanjing Huang, Dahua Lin
Abstract
Large language models (LLMs) garner significant attention for their unprecedented performance, leading to an increasing number of researches evaluating LLMs. However, these evaluation benchmarks are limited to assessing the instruction-following capabilities, overlooking the fundamental abilities that emerge during the pre-training stage. Previous subjective evaluation methods mainly rely on scoring by API models. However, in the absence of references, large models have shown limited ability to discern subtle differences. To bridge the gap, we propose F-Eval, a bilingual evaluation benchmark to evaluate the fundamental abilities, including expression, commonsense and logic. The tasks in F-Eval include multi-choice objective tasks, open-ended objective tasks, reference-based subjective tasks and reference-free subjective tasks. For referencefree subjective tasks, we devise new evaluation methods, serving as alternatives to scoring by API models. We conduct evaluations on 13 advanced LLMs. Results show that our evaluation methods show higher correlation coefficients and larger distinction than other evaluators. Additionally, we discuss the influence of different model sizes, dimensions, and normalization methods. We anticipate that F-Eval will facilitate the study of LLMs' fundamental abilities. 1 * Corresponding Author 1 The code and dataset is available in https://github. com/OpenLMLab/F-Eval .
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext cd1d6e5c-d8d8-4ccb-adff-d1a14086b5b7Builds on10
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTTianyi Zhang, Varsha Kishore, Felix Wu, Kilian Q. Weinberger et al.ICLR 2020 · 8,443 citations
- Measuring Massive Multitask Language UnderstandingDan Hendrycks, Collin Burns, Steven Basart, Andy Zou et al.ICLR 2021 · 7,905 citations
- AlpacaFarm: A Simulation Framework for Methods that Learn from Human FeedbackYann Dubois, Chen Xuechen Li, Rohan Taori, Tianyi Zhang et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 948 citations
- Cross-Task Generalization via Natural Language Crowdsourcing InstructionsSwaroop Mishra, Daniel Khashabi, Chitta Baral, Hannaneh HajishirziACL 2022 · 887 citations
Related papers
- P-MMEval: A Parallel Multilingual Multitask Benchmark for Consistent Evaluation of LLMsYidan Zhang, Yu Wan, Boyi Deng, Baosong Yang et al.EMNLP 2025
- Autonomous Evaluation of LLMs for Truth Maintenance and Reasoning TasksRushang Karia, Daniel Bramblett, Daksh Dobhal, Siddharth SrivastavaICLR 2025
- McEval: Massively Multilingual Code EvaluationLinzheng Chai, Shukai Liu, Jian Yang, Yuwei Yin et al.ICLR 2025 · 1 citation
- Theory of Mind in Large Language Models: Assessment and EnhancementRuirui Chen, Weifeng Jiang, Chengwei Qin, Cheston TanACL 2025
- ToMBench: Benchmarking Theory of Mind in Large Language ModelsZhuang Chen, Jincenzi Wu, Jinfeng Zhou, Bosi Wen et al.ACL 2024 · 6 citations
