On the Evaluation of Capability Estimation Methods for Large Language Models
Qiang Hu, Jin Wen, Yao Zhang, Maxime Cordy, Yongqiang Lyu
Abstract
The emergence of large language models (LLMs) marks a transformative era in artificial intelligence (AI). However, systematically evaluating the capability of LLMs is challenging due to the necessity of a large number of labeled test data. To tackle this problem, in the conventional AI field, AutoEval has been proposed to estimate the capability of AI models without data labeling effort. Unfortunately, even though multiple AutoEval methods have been proposed, most are constructed for classification tasks and evaluated only on image datasets. As a result, their effectiveness for LLMs is unclear, as LLMs often target generation tasks. In this work, we introduce the first AutoEval benchmark specifically designed to estimate the capability of LLMs using unlabeled test data, AEBench. Besides existing AutoEval methods, AEBench also supports our designed method, which utilizes the correlation between data uncertainty and model ability for the capability estimation. In total, AEBench covers 12 AutoEval methods and 120 method combinations. Based on AEBench, we conducted a comprehensive study to explore the usefulness of AutoEval on LLMs. Experimental results on 10 datasets demonstrated that our designed uncertainty features-based methods perform the best in achieving the lowest estimation errors.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext f3d5cba8-59d3-4e6a-9e56-0aaf53721866Builds on12
- Measuring Massive Multitask Language UnderstandingDan Hendrycks, Collin Burns, Steven Basart, Andy Zou et al.ICLR 2021 · 7,905 citations
- Is Your Code Generated by ChatGPT Really Correct? Rigorous Evaluation of Large Language Models for Code GenerationJiawei Liu, Chunqiu Steven Xia, Yuyao Wang, Lingming ZhangNeurIPS 2023 · 2,317 citations
- WILDS: A Benchmark of in-the-Wild Distribution ShiftsPang Wei Koh, Shiori Sagawa, Henrik Marklund, Sang Michael Xie et al.ICML 2021 · 1,773 citations
- HaluEval: A Large-Scale Hallucination Evaluation Benchmark for Large Language ModelsJunyi Li, Xiaoxue Cheng, Xin Zhao, Jian-Yun Nie et al.EMNLP 2023 · 224 citations
- DeepGini: prioritizing massive tests to enhance the robustness of deep neural networksYang Feng, Qingkai Shi, Xinyu Gao, Jun Wan et al.ISSTA 2020 · 206 citations
Related papers
- Autonomous Evaluation of LLMs for Truth Maintenance and Reasoning TasksRushang Karia, Daniel Bramblett, Daksh Dobhal, Siddharth SrivastavaICLR 2025
- DOMAINEVAL: An Auto-Constructed Benchmark for Multi-Domain Code GenerationQiming Zhu, Jialun Cao, Yaojie Lu, Hongyu Lin et al.AAAI 2025 · 25 citations
- StrucText-Eval: Evaluating Large Language Model's Reasoning Ability in Structure-Rich TextZhouhong Gu, Haoning Ye, Xingzhou Chen, Zeyang Zhou et al.ACL 2025
- Large Language Models as Automated Aligners for benchmarking Vision-Language ModelsYuanfeng Ji, Chongjian Ge, Weikai Kong, Enze Xie et al.ICLR 2024 · 10 citations
- F-Eval: Asssessing Fundamental Abilities with Refined Evaluation MethodsYu Sun, Keyuchen Keyuchen, Shujie Wang, Peiji Li et al.ACL 2024
