AgentReview: Exploring Peer Review Dynamics with LLM Agents
Yiqiao Jin, Qinlin Zhao, Yiyang Wang, Hao Chen, Kaijie Zhu, Yijia Xiao, Jindong Wang
Abstract
Peer review is fundamental to the integrity and advancement of scientific publication. Traditional methods of peer review analyses often rely on exploration and statistics of existing peer review data, which do not adequately address the multivariate nature of the process, account for the latent variables, and are further constrained by privacy concerns due to the sensitive nature of the data. We introduce AGENTREVIEW, the first large language model (LLM) based peer review simulation framework, which effectively disentangles the impacts of multiple latent factors and addresses the privacy issue. Our study reveals significant insights, including a notable 37.1% variation in paper decisions due to reviewers' biases, supported by sociological theories such as the social influence theory, altruism fatigue, and authority bias. We believe that this study could offer valuable insights to improve the design of peer review mechanisms. Our code is available at https://github.com/Ahren09/ AgentReview.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 54ebd616-5839-400d-8ac8-021c03422eccCited by top-tier papers24
- Can Large Language Model Agents Simulate Human Trust Behavior?Chengxing Xie, Canyu Chen, Feiran Jia, Ziyu Ye et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 183 citations
- AI-Researcher: Autonomous Scientific InnovationJiabin Tang, Lianghao Xia, Zhonghang Li, Chao HuangNeurIPS 2025 · 101 citations
- DeepReview: Improving LLM-based Paper Review with Human-like Deep Thinking ProcessMinjun Zhu, Yixuan Weng, Linyi Yang, Yue ZhangACL 2025 · 70 citations
- HalluCitation Matters: Revealing the Impact of Hallucinated References with 300 Hallucinated Papers in ACL ConferencesYusuke Sakai, Hidetaka Kamigaito, Taro WatanabeACL 2026 · 18 citations
- From Replication to Redesign: Exploring Pairwise Comparisons for LLM-Based Peer ReviewYaohui Zhang, Haijing Zhang, Wenlong Ji, Tianyu Hua et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 15 citations
Builds on13
- BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTTianyi Zhang, Varsha Kishore, Felix Wu, Kilian Q. Weinberger et al.ICLR 2020 · 8,443 citations
- Generative Agents: Interactive Simulacra of Human BehaviorJoon Sung Park, Joseph C. O'Brien, Carrie Jun Cai, Meredith Ringel Morris et al.UIST 2023 · 1,882 citations
- ChatEval: Towards Better LLM-based Evaluators through Multi-Agent DebateChi-Min Chan, Weize Chen, Yusheng Su, Jianxuan Yu et al.ICLR 2024 · 871 citations
- Image as Set of PointsXu Ma, Yuqian Zhou, Huan Wang, Can Qin et al.ICLR 2023 · 221 citations
- Monitoring AI-Modified Content at Scale: A Case Study on the Impact of ChatGPT on AI Conference Peer ReviewsWeixin Liang, Zachary Izzo, Yaohui Zhang, Haley Lepp et al.ICML 2024 · 213 citations
Related papers
- Agent Reviewers: Domain-specific Multimodal Agents with Shared Memory for Paper ReviewKai Lu, Shixiong Xu, Jinqiu Li, Kun Ding et al.ICML 2025
- Automatic Paper Reviewing with Heterogeneous Graph Reasoning over LLM-Simulated Reviewer-Author DebatesShuaimin Li, Liyang Fan, Yufang Lin, Zeyang Li et al.AAAI 2026 · 1 citation
- Simulating Dispute Mediation with LLM-Based Agents for Legal ResearchJunjie Chen, Haitao Li, Minghao Qin, Yujia Zhou et al.AAAI 2026 · 4 citations
- Can AI Be a Good Peer Reviewer? A Survey of Peer Review Process, Evaluation, and the FutureSihong Wu, Owen Jiang, Yilun Zhao, Tiansheng Hu et al.ACL 2026 · 2 citations
- MetaAgents: Large Language Model Based Agents for Decision-Making on TeamingYuan Li, Lichao Sun, Yixuan ZhangCSCW 2025 · 35 citations
