Agent Reviewers: Domain-specific Multimodal Agents with Shared Memory for Paper Review
Kai Lu, Shixiong Xu, Jinqiu Li, Kun Ding, Gaofeng Meng
Abstract
Feedback from peer review is essential to improve the quality of scientific articles. However, at present, many manuscripts do not receive sufficient external feedback for refinement before or during submission. Therefore, a system capable of providing detailed and professional feedback is crucial for enhancing research efficiency. In this paper, we have compiled the largest dataset of paper reviews to date by collecting historical openaccess papers and their corresponding review comments and standardizing them using LLM. We then developed a multi-agent system that mimics real human review processes, based on LLMs. This system, named Agent Reviewers, includes the innovative introduction of multimodal reviewers to provide feedback on the visual elements of papers. Additionally, a shared memory pool that stores historical papers' metadata is preserved, which supplies reviewer agents with background knowledge from different fields. Our system is evaluated using ICLR 2024 papers and achieves superior performance compared to existing AIbased review systems. Comprehensive ablation studies further demonstrate the effectiveness of each module and agent in this system. Our code and data are available at https://github. com/AReviewers/AgentReviewers .
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 42d5201a-1486-42db-b08d-2b29818d71cdCited by top-tier papers2
- Paper2Rebuttal: A Multi-Agent Framework for Transparent Author Response AssistanceQianli Ma, Chang Guo, Zhiheng Tian, Siyu Wang et al.ACL 2026 · 6 citations
- EvoVLMA: Evolutionary Vision-Language Model AdaptationKun Ding, Ying Wang, Shiming XiangACM MM 2025 · 1 citation
Builds on9
- Generative Agents: Interactive Simulacra of Human BehaviorJoon Sung Park, Joseph C. O'Brien, Carrie Jun Cai, Meredith Ringel Morris et al.UIST 2023 · 1,882 citations
- Debating with More Persuasive LLMs Leads to More Truthful AnswersAkbir Khan, John Hughes, Dan Valentine, Laura Ruis et al.ICML 2024 · 244 citations
- MLAgentBench: Evaluating Language Agents on Machine Learning ExperimentationQian Huang, Jian Vora, Percy Liang, Jure LeskovecICML 2024 · 209 citations
- AutoSurvey: Large Language Models Can Automatically Write SurveysYidong Wang, Qi Guo, Wenjin Yao, Hongbo Zhang et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 151 citations
- NLPeer: A Unified Resource for the Computational Study of Peer ReviewNils Dycke, Ilia Kuznetsov, Iryna GurevychACL 2023 · 17 citations
Related papers
- AgentReview: Exploring Peer Review Dynamics with LLM AgentsYiqiao Jin, Qinlin Zhao, Yiyang Wang, Hao Chen et al.EMNLP 2024 · 24 citations
- DeepReview: Improving LLM-based Paper Review with Human-like Deep Thinking ProcessMinjun Zhu, Yixuan Weng, Linyi Yang, Yue ZhangACL 2025 · 70 citations
- AirQA: A Comprehensive QA Dataset for AI Research with Instance-Level EvaluationTiancheng Huang, Ruisheng Cao, Yuxin Zhang, Zhangyi Kang et al.ICLR 2026 · 1 citation
- ReviewGrounder: Improving Review Substantiveness with Rubric-Guided, Tool-Integrated AgentsZhuofeng Li, Yi Lu, Dongfu Jiang, Haoxiang Zhang et al.ACL 2026 · 1 citation
- Can AI Be a Good Peer Reviewer? A Survey of Peer Review Process, Evaluation, and the FutureSihong Wu, Owen Jiang, Yilun Zhao, Tiansheng Hu et al.ACL 2026 · 2 citations
