Towards General Robustness Verification of MaxPool-Based Convolutional Neural Networks via Tightening Linear Approximation
Yuan Xiao, Shiqing Ma, Juan Zhai, Chunrong Fang, Jinyuan Jia, Zhenyu Chen
Abstract
The robustness of convolutional neural networks (CNNs) is vital to modern AI-driven systems. It can be quanti-fied by formal verification by providing a certified lower bound, within which any perturbation does not alter the original input's classification result. It is challenging due to nonlinear components, such as MaxPool. At present, many verification methods are sound but risk losing some precision to enhance efficiency and scalability, and thus, a certified lower bound is a crucial criterion for evaluating the performance of verification tools. In this paper, we present MaxLin, a robustness verifier for MaxPool-based CNNs with tight Linear approximation. By tight-ening the linear approximation of the MaxPool function, we can certify larger certified lower bounds of CNNs. We evaluate MaxLin with open-sourced benchmarks, including LeNet and networks trained on the MNIST, CIFAR-10, and Tiny ImageNet datasets. The results show that MaxLin outperforms state-of-the-art tools with up to 110.60% improvement regarding the certified lower bound and 5.13 × speedup for the same neural networks. Our code is available at https://github.com/xiaoyuanpigo/maxlin.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext aebf6998-4e23-464d-96c6-93e004b9472dCited by top-tier papers2
- Verifying Neural Network Robustness with Dual PerturbationsHai Duong, Lam Nguyen, Thanh Le, ThanhVu NguyenCVPR 2026 · 4 citations
- Tightening Robustness Verification of MaxPool-based Neural Networks via Minimizing the Over-Approximation ZoneYuan Xiao, Yuchen Chen, Shiqing Ma, Chunrong Fang et al.CVPR 2025
Builds on15
- Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural NetworksNicholas Carlini, David A. WagnerS&P 2017 · 9,786 citations
- A ConvNet for the 2020sZhuang Liu, Hanzi Mao, Chao-Yuan Wu, Christoph Feichtenhofer et al.CVPR 2022 · 6,782 citations
- Distillation as a Defense to Adversarial Perturbations Against Deep Neural NetworksNicolas Papernot, Patrick D. McDaniel, Xi Wu, Somesh Jha et al.S&P 2016 · 3,275 citations
- HopSkipJumpAttack: A Query-Efficient Decision-Based AttackJianbo Chen, Michael I. Jordan, Martin J. WainwrightS&P 2020 · 797 citations
- Beta-CROWN: Efficient Bound Propagation with Per-neuron Split Constraints for Neural Network Robustness VerificationShiqi Wang, Huan Zhang, Kaidi Xu, Xue Lin et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 359 citations
Related papers
- Tightening Robustness Verification of Convolutional Neural Networks with Fine-Grained Linear ApproximationYiting Wu, Min ZhangAAAI 2021 · 23 citations
- Provably Tightest Linear Approximation for Robustness Verification of Sigmoid-like Neural NetworksZhaodi Zhang, Yiting Wu, Si Liu, Jing Liu et al.ASE 2022 · 11 citations
- Overcoming the Convex Barrier for Simplex InputsHarkirat Singh Behl, M. Pawan Kumar, Philip H. S. Torr, Krishnamurthy DvijothamNeurIPS 2021 · 7 citations
- A Tale of Two Approximations: Tightening Over-Approximation for DNN Robustness Verification via Under-ApproximationZhiyi Xue, Si Liu, Zhaodi Zhang, Yiting Wu et al.ISSTA 2023 · 5 citations
- Certified Robustness Under Bounded Levenshtein DistanceElías Abad-Rocamora, Grigorios Chrysos, Volkan CevherICLR 2025
