A Tale of Two Approximations: Tightening Over-Approximation for DNN Robustness Verification via Under-Approximation
Zhiyi Xue, Si Liu, Zhaodi Zhang, Yiting Wu, Min Zhang
Abstract
The robustness of deep neural networks (DNNs) is crucial to the hosting system's reliability and security. Formal verification has been demonstrated to be effective in providing provable robustness guarantees. To improve its scalability, over-approximating the nonlinear activation functions in DNNs by linear constraints has been widely adopted, which transforms the verification problem into an efficiently solvable linear programming problem. Many efforts have been dedicated to defining the so-called tightest approximations to reduce overestimation imposed by over-approximation. In this paper, we study existing approaches and identify a dominant factor in defining tight approximation, namely the approximation domain of the activation function. We find out that tight approximations defined on approximation domains may not be as tight as the ones on their actual domains, yet existing approaches all rely only on approximation domains. Based on this observation, we propose a novel dual-approximation approach to tighten overapproximations, leveraging an activation function's underestimated domain to define tight approximation bounds. We implement our approach with two complementary algorithms based respectively on Monte Carlo simulation and gradient descent into a tool called DualApp. We assess it on a comprehensive benchmark of DNNs with different architectures. Our experimental results show that DualApp significantly outperforms the state-of-the-art approaches with 100% -1000% improvement on the verified robustness ratio and 10.64% on average (up to 66.53%) on the certified lower bound. CCS CONCEPTS • Software and its engineering → Formal software verification; • Computing methodologies → Neural networks.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on20
- Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural NetworksNicholas Carlini, David A. WagnerS&P 2017 · 9,786 citations
- AI2: Safety and Robustness Certification of Neural Networks with Abstract InterpretationTimon Gehr, Matthew Mirman, Dana Drachsler-Cohen, Petar Tsankov et al.S&P 2018 · 987 citations
- Formal Security Analysis of Neural Networks using Symbolic IntervalsShiqi Wang, Kexin Pei, Justin Whitehouse, Junfeng Yang et al.USENIX Security 2018 · 523 citations
- General Cutting Planes for Bound-Propagation-Based Neural Network VerificationHuan Zhang, Shiqi Wang, Kaidi Xu, Linyi Li et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 154 citations
- The Convex Relaxation Barrier, Revisited: Tightened Single-Neuron Relaxations for Neural Network VerificationChristian Tjandraatmadja, Ross Anderson, Joey Huchette, Will Ma et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 102 citations
Related papers
- Tightening Robustness Verification of Convolutional Neural Networks with Fine-Grained Linear ApproximationYiting Wu, Min ZhangAAAI 2021 · 23 citations
- Convex Hull Approximation for Activation FunctionsZhongkui Ma, Zihan Wang, Guangdong BaiOOPSLA 2025 · 2 citations
- Provably Tightest Linear Approximation for Robustness Verification of Sigmoid-like Neural NetworksZhaodi Zhang, Yiting Wu, Si Liu, Jing Liu et al.ASE 2022 · 11 citations
- Tighter Truncated Rectangular Prism Approximation for RNN Robustness VerificationXingqi Lin, Liangyu Chen, Min Wu, Min Zhang et al.AAAI 2026
- SOL: Sampling-based Optimal Linear bounding of arbitrary scalar functionsYuriy Biktairov, Jyotirmoy DeshmukhNeurIPS 2023 · 3 citations
