USENIX Security2018Top-tier venue
Formal Security Analysis of Neural Networks using Symbolic Intervals
Shiqi Wang, Kexin Pei, Justin Whitehouse, Junfeng Yang, Suman Jana
Abstract
Due to the increasing deployment of Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) in real-world security-critical domains including autonomous vehicles and collision avoidance systems, formally checking security properties of DNNs, especially under different attacker capabilities, is becoming crucial. Most existing security testing techniques for DNNs try to find adversarial examples without providing any formal security guarantees about the non-existence of such adversarial examples. Recently, several projects have used different types of Satisfiability Modulo Theory (SMT) solvers to formally check security properties of DNNs. However, all of these approaches are limited by the high overhead caused by the solver. In this paper, we present a new direction for formally checking security properties of DNNs without using SMT solvers. Instead, we leverage interval arithmetic to compute rigorous bounds on the DNN outputs. Our approach, unlike existing solver-based approaches, is easily parallelizable. We further present symbolic interval analysis along with several other optimizations to minimize overestimations of output bounds. We design, implement, and evaluate our approach as part of ReluVal, a system for formally checking security properties of Relu-based DNNs. Our extensive empirical results show that ReluVal outperforms Reluplex, a state-of-the-art solver-based system, by 200 times on average. On a single 8-core machine without GPUs, within 4 hours, ReluVal is able to verify a security property that Reluplex deemed inconclusive due to timeout after running for more than 5 days. Our experiments demonstrate that symbolic interval analysis is a promising new direction towards rigorously analyzing different security properties of DNNs.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers93
- Certified Robustness to Adversarial Examples with Differential PrivacyMathias Lécuyer, Vaggelis Atlidakis, Roxana Geambasu, Daniel Hsu et al.S&P 2019 · 1,022 citations
- Beta-CROWN: Efficient Bound Propagation with Per-neuron Split Constraints for Neural Network Robustness VerificationShiqi Wang, Huan Zhang, Kaidi Xu, Xue Lin et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 359 citations
- Fast and Complete: Enabling Complete Neural Network Verification with Rapid and Massively Parallel Incomplete VerifiersKaidi Xu, Huan Zhang, Shiqi Wang, Yihan Wang et al.ICLR 2021 · 250 citations
- HYDRA: Pruning Adversarially Robust Neural NetworksVikash Sehwag, Shiqi Wang, Prateek Mittal, Suman JanaNeurIPS 2020 · 242 citations
- Scalable Verified Training for Provably Robust Image ClassificationSven Gowal, Krishnamurthy Dvijotham, Robert Stanforth, Rudy Bunel et al.ICCV 2019 · 196 citations
Builds on2
Related papers
- ReluDiff: differential verification of deep neural networksBrandon Paulsen, Jingbo Wang, Chao WangICSE 2020 · 47 citations
- Efficient Verification of ReLU-Based Neural Networks via Dependency AnalysisElena Botoeva, Panagiotis Kouvaros, Jan Kronqvist, Alessio Lomuscio et al.AAAI 2020 · 140 citations
- Efficient Verification and Falsification of ReLU Neural Barrier CertificatesDejin Ren, Yiling Xue, Taoran Wu, Bai XueAAAI 2026
- Precise Verification of Transformers Through ReLU-Catalyzed Abstraction RefinementHengjie Liu, Zhenya Zhang, Jianjun ZhaoCAV 2026
- Automated Verification of Soundness of DNN CertifiersAvaljot Singh, Yasmin Sarita, Charith Mendis, Gagandeep SinghOOPSLA 2025 · 3 citations
