Certified Robustness to Adversarial Examples with Differential Privacy
Mathias Lécuyer, Vaggelis Atlidakis, Roxana Geambasu, Daniel Hsu, Suman Jana
Abstract
Adversarial examples that fool machine learning models, particularly deep neural networks, have been a topic of intense research interest, with attacks and defenses being developed in a tight back-and-forth. Most past defenses are best effort and have been shown to be vulnerable to sophisticated attacks. Recently a set of certified defenses have been introduced, which provide guarantees of robustness to norm-bounded attacks. However these defenses either do not scale to large datasets or are limited in the types of models they can support. This paper presents the first certified defense that both scales to large networks and datasets (such as Google’s Inception network for ImageNet) and applies broadly to arbitrary model types. Our defense, called PixelDP, is based on a novel connection between robustness against adversarial examples and differential privacy, a cryptographically-inspired privacy formalism, that provides a rigorous, generic, and flexible foundation for defense.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 23f6df0e-515c-45b2-9453-c3d4ffda5fb1Cited by top-tier papers299
- Reliable evaluation of adversarial robustness with an ensemble of diverse parameter-free attacksFrancesco Croce, Matthias HeinICML 2020 · 2,337 citations
- Overfitting in adversarially robust deep learningLeslie Rice, Eric Wong, J. Zico KolterICML 2020 · 935 citations
- SplitFed: When Federated Learning Meets Split LearningChandra Thapa, Mahawaga Arachchige Pathum Chamikara, Seyit Camtepe, Lichao SunAAAI 2022 · 863 citations
- Do Adversarially Robust ImageNet Models Transfer Better?Hadi Salman, Andrew Ilyas, Logan Engstrom, Ashish Kapoor et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 506 citations
- Attacks Which Do Not Kill Training Make Adversarial Learning StrongerJingfeng Zhang, Xilie Xu, Bo Han, Gang Niu et al.ICML 2020 · 452 citations
Builds on6
- Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural NetworksNicholas Carlini, David A. WagnerS&P 2017 · 9,786 citations
- Deep Learning with Differential PrivacyMartín Abadi, Andy Chu, Ian J. Goodfellow, H. Brendan McMahan et al.CCS 2016 · 7,620 citations
- Distillation as a Defense to Adversarial Perturbations Against Deep Neural NetworksNicolas Papernot, Patrick D. McDaniel, Xi Wu, Somesh Jha et al.S&P 2016 · 3,275 citations
- MagNet: A Two-Pronged Defense against Adversarial ExamplesDongyu Meng, Hao ChenCCS 2017 · 1,295 citations
- AI2: Safety and Robustness Certification of Neural Networks with Abstract InterpretationTimon Gehr, Matthew Mirman, Dana Drachsler-Cohen, Petar Tsankov et al.S&P 2018 · 987 citations
Related papers
- Enhancing the Antidote: Improved Pointwise Certifications against Poisoning AttacksShijie Liu, Andrew C. Cullen, Paul Montague, Sarah M. Erfani et al.AAAI 2023 · 7 citations
- Breaking Certified Defenses: Semantic Adversarial Examples with Spoofed robustness CertificatesAmin Ghiasi, Ali Shafahi, Tom GoldsteinICLR 2020 · 57 citations
- GSmooth: Certified Robustness against Semantic Transformations via Generalized Randomized SmoothingZhongkai Hao, Chengyang Ying, Yinpeng Dong, Hang Su et al.ICML 2022 · 27 citations
- (De)Randomized Smoothing for Certifiable Defense against Patch AttacksAlexander Levine, Soheil FeiziNeurIPS 2020 · 188 citations
- A Critical Revisit of Adversarial Robustness in 3D Point Cloud Recognition with Diffusion-Driven PurificationJiachen Sun, Jiongxiao Wang, Weili Nie, Zhiding Yu et al.ICML 2023 · 24 citations
