Distillation as a Defense to Adversarial Perturbations Against Deep Neural Networks
Nicolas Papernot, Patrick D. McDaniel, Xi Wu, Somesh Jha, Ananthram Swami
Abstract
Deep learning algorithms have been shown to perform extremely well on many classical machine learning problems. However, recent studies have shown that deep learning, like other machine learning techniques, is vulnerable to adversarial samples: inputs crafted to force a deep neural network (DNN) to provide adversary-selected outputs. Such attacks can seriously undermine the security of the system supported by the DNN, sometimes with devastating consequences. For example, autonomous vehicles can be crashed, illicit or illegal content can bypass content filters, or biometric authentication systems can be manipulated to allow improper access. In this work, we introduce a defensive mechanism called defensive distillation to reduce the effectiveness of adversarial samples on DNNs. We analytically investigate the generalizability and robustness properties granted by the use of defensive distillation when training DNNs. We also empirically study the effectiveness of our defense mechanisms on two DNNs placed in adversarial settings. The study shows that defensive distillation can reduce effectiveness of sample creation from 95% to less than 0.5% on a studied DNN. Such dramatic gains can be explained by the fact that distillation leads gradients used in adversarial sample creation to be reduced by a factor of 10 30 . We also find that distillation increases the average minimum number of features that need to be modified to create adversarial samples by about 800% on one of the DNNs we tested.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 4a66ef71-ac62-4178-90ca-b6a7853307c9Cited by top-tier papers300
- Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural NetworksNicholas Carlini, David A. WagnerS&P 2017 · 9,786 citations
- Accessorize to a Crime: Real and Stealthy Attacks on State-of-the-Art Face RecognitionMahmood Sharif, Sruti Bhagavatula, Lujo Bauer, Michael K. ReiterCCS 2016 · 1,765 citations
- Feature Squeezing: Detecting Adversarial Examples in Deep Neural NetworksWeilin Xu, David Evans, Yanjun QiNDSS 2018 · 1,633 citations
- Trojaning Attack on Neural NetworksYingqi Liu, Shiqing Ma, Yousra Aafer, Wen-Chuan Lee et al.NDSS 2018 · 1,377 citations
- Fast is better than free: Revisiting adversarial trainingEric Wong, Leslie Rice, J. Zico KolterICLR 2020 · 1,352 citations
Related papers
- Adversarial Defense via Learning to Generate Diverse AttacksYunseok Jang, Tianchen Zhao, Seunghoon Hong, Honglak LeeICCV 2019 · 88 citations
- DNNGuard: An Elastic Heterogeneous DNN Accelerator Architecture against Adversarial AttacksXingbin Wang, Rui Hou, Boyan Zhao, Fengkai Yuan et al.ASPLOS 2020 · 33 citations
- AI-Guardian: Defeating Adversarial Attacks using BackdoorsHong Zhu, Shengzhi Zhang, Kai ChenS&P 2023
- Margin-based Neural Network WatermarkingByungjoo Kim, Suyoung Lee, Seanie Lee, Sooel Son et al.ICML 2023 · 21 citations
- Nasty Adversarial Training: A Probability Sparsity Perspective for Robustness EnhancementYuhang Zhou, Zhongyun Hua, Zhaoquan Gu, Keke Tang et al.ICLR 2026
