Nasty Adversarial Training: A Probability Sparsity Perspective for Robustness Enhancement
Yuhang Zhou, Zhongyun Hua, Zhaoquan Gu, Keke Tang, Rushi Lan, Yushu Zhang, Qing Liao, Leo Yu Zhang
Abstract
The vulnerability of deep neural networks to adversarial examples poses significant challenges to their reliable deployment. Among empirical defenses, adversarial training and robust distillation remain the most effective. In this paper, we identify a property originally studied in the context of model intellectual property protection, i.e., probability sparsity induced by nasty training, and reveal its potential to enhance adversarial robustness in an interpretable manner. We first analyze how nasty training drives models toward sparse probability distributions and qualitatively explore the spatial metric preferences introduced by such sparsity. Building on these insights, we propose nasty adversarial training (NAT), a simple yet effective adversarial training framework that incorporates probability sparsity as a regularization mechanism to strengthen robustness. Both theoretical analysis and extensive experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of NAT, showing that probability sparsity not only improves adversarial resilience but also provides interpretability to the robustness gains.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 5374c91a-885e-4d59-9a4e-7e196084fa3eBuilds on30
- An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at ScaleAlexey Dosovitskiy, Lucas Beyer, Alexander Kolesnikov, Dirk Weissenborn et al.ICLR 2021 · 21,477 citations
- Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural NetworksNicholas Carlini, David A. WagnerS&P 2017 · 9,786 citations
- Distillation as a Defense to Adversarial Perturbations Against Deep Neural NetworksNicolas Papernot, Patrick D. McDaniel, Xi Wu, Somesh Jha et al.S&P 2016 · 3,275 citations
- Reliable evaluation of adversarial robustness with an ensemble of diverse parameter-free attacksFrancesco Croce, Matthias HeinICML 2020 · 2,337 citations
- Overfitting in adversarially robust deep learningLeslie Rice, Eric Wong, J. Zico KolterICML 2020 · 935 citations
Related papers
- Adversarial Robustness Through the Lens of CausalityYonggang Zhang, Mingming Gong, Tongliang Liu, Gang Niu et al.ICLR 2022 · 65 citations
- Discrete Adversarial Attack to Models of CodeFengjuan Gao, Yu Wang, Ke WangPLDI 2023 · 23 citations
- Improving Adversarial Robustness via Guided Complement EntropyHao-Yun Chen, Jhao-Hong Liang, Shih-Chieh Chang, Jia-Yu Pan et al.ICCV 2019 · 51 citations
- How Many Perturbations Break This Model? Evaluating Robustness Beyond Adversarial AccuracyRaphaël Olivier, Bhiksha RajICML 2023 · 11 citations
- Explicit Tradeoffs between Adversarial and Natural Distributional RobustnessMazda Moayeri, Kiarash Banihashem, Soheil FeiziNeurIPS 2022 · 28 citations
