SplitFed: When Federated Learning Meets Split Learning
Chandra Thapa, Mahawaga Arachchige Pathum Chamikara, Seyit Camtepe, Lichao Sun
Abstract
Federated learning (FL) and split learning (SL) are two popular distributed machine learning approaches. Both follow a model-to-data scenario; clients train and test machine learning models without sharing raw data. SL provides better model privacy than FL due to the machine learning model architecture split between clients and the server. Moreover, the split model makes SL a better option for resource-constrained environments. However, SL performs slower than FL due to the relay-based training across multiple clients. In this regard, this paper presents a novel approach, named splitfed learning (SFL), that amalgamates the two approaches eliminating their inherent drawbacks, along with a refined architectural configuration incorporating differential privacy and PixelDP to enhance data privacy and model robustness. Our analysis and empirical results demonstrate that (pure) SFL provides similar test accuracy and communication efficiency as SL while significantly decreasing its computation time per global epoch than in SL for multiple clients. Furthermore, as in SL, its communication efficiency over FL improves with the number of clients. Besides, the performance of SFL with privacy and robustness measures is further evaluated under extended experimental settings.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 77758edc-e60c-4b42-ad0b-02672a23f4deCited by top-tier papers32
- BlindFL: Vertical Federated Machine Learning without Peeking into Your DataFangcheng Fu, Huanran Xue, Yong Cheng, Yangyu Tao et al.SIGMOD 2022 · 53 citations
- SplitGP: Achieving Both Generalization and Personalization in Federated LearningDong-Jun Han, Do-Yeon Kim, Minseok Choi, Christopher G. Brinton et al.INFOCOM 2023 · 43 citations
- MergeSFL: Split Federated Learning with Feature Merging and Batch Size RegulationYunming Liao, Yang Xu, Hongli Xu, Lun Wang et al.ICDE 2024 · 41 citations
- PeFLL: Personalized Federated Learning by Learning to LearnJonathan Scott, Hossein Zakerinia, Christoph H. LampertICLR 2024 · 36 citations
- Titanic: Towards Production Federated Learning with Large Language ModelsNingxin Su, Chenghao Hu, Baochun Li, Bo LiINFOCOM 2024 · 30 citations
Builds on2
- Deep Learning with Differential PrivacyMartín Abadi, Andy Chu, Ian J. Goodfellow, H. Brendan McMahan et al.CCS 2016 · 7,620 citations
- Certified Robustness to Adversarial Examples with Differential PrivacyMathias Lécuyer, Vaggelis Atlidakis, Roxana Geambasu, Daniel Hsu et al.S&P 2019 · 1,022 citations
Related papers
- Convergence Analysis of Split Federated Learning on Heterogeneous DataPengchao Han, Chao Huang, Geng Tian, Ming Tang et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 32 citations
- LocFedMix-SL: Localize, Federate, and Mix for Improved Scalability, Convergence, and Latency in Split LearningSeungeun Oh, Jihong Park, Praneeth Vepakomma, Sihun Baek et al.WWW 2022 · 66 citations
- pFedAFM: Adaptive Feature Mixture for Data-Level Personalization in Heterogeneous Federated Learning on Mobile Edge DevicesLiping Yi, Han Yu, Gang Wang, Xiaoguang Liu et al.ICDE 2025 · 4 citations
- Efficient Split-Mix Federated Learning for On-Demand and In-Situ CustomizationJunyuan Hong, Haotao Wang, Zhangyang Wang, Jiayu ZhouICLR 2022 · 77 citations
- FedCross: Towards Accurate Federated Learning via Multi-Model Cross-AggregationMing Hu, Peiheng Zhou, Zhihao Yue, Zhiwei Ling et al.ICDE 2024 · 32 citations
