Overcoming the Convex Barrier for Simplex Inputs
Harkirat Singh Behl, M. Pawan Kumar, Philip H. S. Torr, Krishnamurthy Dvijotham
Abstract
Recent progress in neural network verification has challenged the notion of a convex barrier, that is, an inherent weakness in the convex relaxation of the output of a neural network. Specifically, there now exists a tight relaxation for verifying the robustness of a neural network to ∞ input perturbations, as well as efficient primal and dual solvers for the relaxation. Buoyed by this success, we consider the problem of developing similar techniques for verifying robustness to input perturbations within the probability simplex. We prove a somewhat surprising result that, in this case, not only can one design a tight relaxation that overcomes the convex barrier, but the size of the relaxation remains linear in the number of neurons, thereby leading to simpler and more efficient algorithms. We establish the scalability of our overall approach via the specification of 1 robustness for CIFAR-10 and MNIST classification, where our approach improves the state of the art verified accuracy by up to 14.4%. Furthermore, we establish its accuracy on a novel and highly challenging task of verifying the robustness of a multi-modal (text and image) classifier to arbitrary changes in its textual input.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext a12ff301-000a-4ce4-8652-47c43bdf051fCited by top-tier papers3
- Scalable Neural Network Verification with Branch-and-bound Inferred Cutting PlanesDuo Zhou, Christopher Brix, Grani A. Hanasusanto, Huan ZhangNeurIPS 2024 · 49 citations
- Improved techniques for deterministic l2 robustnessSahil Singla, Soheil FeiziNeurIPS 2022 · 13 citations
- Clip-and-Verify: Linear Constraint-Driven Domain Clipping for Accelerating Neural Network VerificationDuo Zhou, Jorge Chavez, Hesun Chen, Grani A. Hanasusanto et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 10 citations
Builds on6
- Automatic Perturbation Analysis for Scalable Certified Robustness and BeyondKaidi Xu, Zhouxing Shi, Huan Zhang, Yihan Wang et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 415 citations
- Fast and Complete: Enabling Complete Neural Network Verification with Rapid and Massively Parallel Incomplete VerifiersKaidi Xu, Huan Zhang, Shiqi Wang, Yihan Wang et al.ICLR 2021 · 250 citations
- The Convex Relaxation Barrier, Revisited: Tightened Single-Neuron Relaxations for Neural Network VerificationChristian Tjandraatmadja, Ross Anderson, Joey Huchette, Will Ma et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 102 citations
- Neural Network Branching for Neural Network VerificationJingyue Lu, M. Pawan KumarICLR 2020 · 74 citations
- Scaling the Convex Barrier with Active SetsAlessandro De Palma, Harkirat S. Behl, Rudy Bunel, Philip H. S. Torr et al.ICLR 2021 · 66 citations
Related papers
- Tightening Robustness Verification of Convolutional Neural Networks with Fine-Grained Linear ApproximationYiting Wu, Min ZhangAAAI 2021 · 23 citations
- Provably Tightest Linear Approximation for Robustness Verification of Sigmoid-like Neural NetworksZhaodi Zhang, Yiting Wu, Si Liu, Jing Liu et al.ASE 2022 · 11 citations
- Probably Approximately Global Robustness CertificationPeter Blohm, Patrick Indri, Thomas Gärtner, Sagar MalhotraICML 2025
- Verifying Properties of Binary Neural Networks Using Sparse Polynomial OptimizationJianting Yang, Srecko Ðurasinovic, Jean B. Lasserre, Victor Magron et al.ICLR 2025
- Expressiveness of Multi-Neuron Convex Relaxations in Neural Network CertificationYuhao Mao, Yani Zhang, Martin T. VechevICLR 2026 · 4 citations
