Tightening Robustness Verification of MaxPool-based Neural Networks via Minimizing the Over-Approximation Zone
Yuan Xiao, Yuchen Chen, Shiqing Ma, Chunrong Fang, Tongtong Bai, Mingzheng Gu, Yuxin Cheng, Yanwei Chen, Zhenyu Chen
Abstract
The robustness of neural network classifiers is important in the safety-critical domain and can be quantified by robustness verification. At present, efficient and scalable verification techniques are always sound but incomplete, and thus, the improvement of verified robustness results is the key criterion to evaluate the performance of incomplete verification approaches. The multi-variate function MaxPool is widely adopted yet challenging to verify. In this paper, we present Ti-Lin, a robustness verifier for MaxPool-based CNNs with Tight Linear Approximation. Following the sequel of minimizing the over-approximation zone of the nonlinear function of CNNs, we are the first to propose the provably neuron-wise tightest linear bounds for the MaxPool function. By our proposed linear bounds, we can certify larger robustness results for CNNs. We evaluate the effectiveness of Ti-Lin on different verification frameworks with open-sourced benchmarks, including LeNet, PointNet, and networks trained on the MNIST, CIFAR-10, Tiny ImageNet and ModelNet40 datasets. Experimental results show that Ti-Lin significantly outperforms the state-of-the-art methods across all networks with up to 78.6% improvement in terms of the certified accuracy with almost the same time consumption as the fastest tool. Our code is available at https://github.com/xiaoyuanpigo/Ti-Lin- Hybrid-Lin.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 708597df-5a26-4eb9-a05c-0012e78cbb78Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on26
- Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural NetworksNicholas Carlini, David A. WagnerS&P 2017 · 9,786 citations
- A ConvNet for the 2020sZhuang Liu, Hanzi Mao, Chao-Yuan Wu, Christoph Feichtenhofer et al.CVPR 2022 · 6,782 citations
- Distillation as a Defense to Adversarial Perturbations Against Deep Neural NetworksNicolas Papernot, Patrick D. McDaniel, Xi Wu, Somesh Jha et al.S&P 2016 · 3,275 citations
- Fast is better than free: Revisiting adversarial trainingEric Wong, Leslie Rice, J. Zico KolterICLR 2020 · 1,352 citations
- HopSkipJumpAttack: A Query-Efficient Decision-Based AttackJianbo Chen, Michael I. Jordan, Martin J. WainwrightS&P 2020 · 797 citations
Related papers
- Towards General Robustness Verification of MaxPool-Based Convolutional Neural Networks via Tightening Linear ApproximationYuan Xiao, Shiqing Ma, Juan Zhai, Chunrong Fang et al.CVPR 2024 · 1 citation
- Tightening Robustness Verification of Convolutional Neural Networks with Fine-Grained Linear ApproximationYiting Wu, Min ZhangAAAI 2021 · 23 citations
- Provably Tightest Linear Approximation for Robustness Verification of Sigmoid-like Neural NetworksZhaodi Zhang, Yiting Wu, Si Liu, Jing Liu et al.ASE 2022 · 11 citations
- A Tale of Two Approximations: Tightening Over-Approximation for DNN Robustness Verification via Under-ApproximationZhiyi Xue, Si Liu, Zhaodi Zhang, Yiting Wu et al.ISSTA 2023 · 5 citations
- Robustness Certification for Point Cloud ModelsTobias Lorenz, Anian Ruoss, Mislav Balunovic, Gagandeep Singh et al.ICCV 2021 · 29 citations
