Affordances and Design Principles of The Political Left and Right
Felix Anand Epp, Jesse Haapoja, Matti Nelimarkka
Abstract
Like any form of technology, social media services embed values. To examine how societal values may be present in these systems, we focus on exploring political ideology as a value system. We organised four co-design workshops with political representatives from five major parties in Finland to investigate what values they would incorporate into social media services. The participants were divided into one right-leaning group, two left-leaning groups, and one mixed group. This approach allows us to examine the differences in social media services designed by groups with different political ideologies i.e., value systems. We analysed produced artefacts (early-stage paper mockups) to identify different features and affordances for each group and then contrasted the ideological compositions. Our results revealed a clear distinction between groups: the right-leaning group favoured market-based visibility, while left-leaning groups rejected such design principles in favour of open profile work. Additionally, we found tentative differences in design outcomes along the liberal-conservative dimension. These findings underscore the importance of acknowledging existing political value systems in the design of social computing systems. They also highlight the need for further research to map out political ideologies in technology design.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext aba809a6-3af4-40c7-929c-f03ff3639cf5Builds on5
- Digital Juries: A Civics-Oriented Approach to Platform GovernanceJenny Fan, Amy X. ZhangCHI 2020 · 90 citations
- PolicyKit: Building Governance in Online CommunitiesAmy X. Zhang, Grant Hugh, Michael S. BernsteinUIST 2020 · 60 citations
- Embedding Democratic Values into Social Media AIs via Societal Objective FunctionsChenyan Jia, Michelle S. Lam, Minh Chau Mai, Jeffrey T. Hancock et al.CSCW 2024 · 32 citations
- Party Politics, Values and the Design of Social Media Services: Implications of political elites' values and ideologies to mitigating of political polarisation through designKirsikka Grön, Matti NelimarkkaCSCW 2020 · 22 citations
- Broadening Exposure to Socio-Political Opinions via a Pushy Smart Home DeviceTom Feltwell, Gavin Wood, Phillip Brooker, Scarlett Rowland et al.CHI 2020 · 16 citations
Related papers
- "Why do you need 400 photographs of 400 different Lockheed Constellation?": Value Expressions by Contributors and Users of Wikimedia CommonsYihan Yu, David W. McDonaldCSCW 2023 · 2 citations
- Aligning Multidimensional Worldviews and Discovering Ideological DifferencesJeremiah Milbauer, Adarsh Mathew, James EvansEMNLP 2021 · 7 citations
- Upvotes? Downvotes? No Votes? Understanding the relationship between reaction mechanisms and political discourse on RedditOrestis Papakyriakopoulos, Severin Engelmann, Amy A. WinecoffCHI 2023 · 27 citations
- Utility Engineering: Analyzing and Controlling Emergent Value Systems in AIsMantas Mazeika, Xuwang Yin, Rishub Tamirisa, Jaehyuk Lim et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 84 citations
- Influencers vs. Legacy Media on Instagram: Effects on Perceived Credibility and Following IntentionCherie Sew, Safira Nugroho, Suwani Gunasekara, Adélaïde Genay et al.CHI 2026 · 1 citation
