Party Politics, Values and the Design of Social Media Services: Implications of political elites' values and ideologies to mitigating of political polarisation through design
Kirsikka Grön, Matti Nelimarkka
Abstract
There have been several attempts to support political engagement through novel social media services. While the political nature of any technologies is widely acknowledged in human-computer interaction, such considerations have been less studied when designing for political engagement in social media services. We used speculative design probes to gauge how political elites perceive alternative social media interfaces designed to increase media diversity and decrease political polarisation. We show how elites? reactions to design probes could be rooted into party ideologies. Based on these, we discuss directions how social media services could be designed. Our underlying contribution is wider. We show how studying elites can provide insights about politics embedded into proposed novel social media services for political engagement. Second, we demonstrate what elites? perspective provide fruitful way to expand and rethink concepts that have been used to study ordinary people before. Finally, we discuss potential challenges of replacing economic interests with political interest in social media service design and provide a richer account on the discussion about social media regulation. Therefore, we pave the way to more research to critically study elites within social computing scholarship and highlight the importance of understanding political motivations which can guide the development of social media.
Ask about this paper
Ask your agent about it.
Lune has read the top-tier papers around this one, so every answer names the papers it rests on.
Cited by top-tier papers5
- Comparing the Perceived Legitimacy of Content Moderation Processes: Contractors, Algorithms, Expert Panels, and Digital JuriesChristina A. Pan, Sahil Yakhmi, Tara P. Iyer, Evan Strasnick et al.CSCW 2022 · 68 citations
- Applying Critical Voice in Design of User Interfaces for Supporting Self-Reflection and Emotion Regulation in Online News CommentingJoel Kiskola, Thomas Olsson, Heli Väätäjä, Aleksi H. Syrjämäki et al.CHI 2021 · 30 citations
- Sub-Standards and Mal-Practices: Misinformation's Role in Insular, Polarized, and Toxic Interactions on RedditHans W. A. Hanley, Zakir DurumericCSCW 2025 · 2 citations
- Affordances and Design Principles of The Political Left and RightFelix Anand Epp, Jesse Haapoja, Matti NelimarkkaCSCW 2025 · 2 citations
- Twits, Toxic Tweets, and Tribal Tendencies: Trends in Politically Polarized Posts on TwitterHans W. A. Hanley, Zakir DurumericCSCW 2025
Related papers
- Should the Powerful Be Moderated? Examining Social Media Users’ Perspectives on Moderating Politicians’ Inappropriate SpeechAlyvia Walters, Shagun JhaverCSCW 2026
- Someone Is Wrong on the Internet: Having Hard Conversations in Online SpacesAmanda Baughan, Justin Petelka, Catherine Jaekyung Yoo, Jack Lo et al.CSCW 2021 · 29 citations
- Affective Design: The Influence of Facebook Reactions on the Emotional Expression of the 114th US CongressJacob Erickson, Bei YanCHI 2024 · 4 citations
- Social Media as Marginalisation Machine: The Trans Desire for Solidarity SpacesKay Kender, Katta SpielCHI 2025 · 12 citations
- Upvotes? Downvotes? No Votes? Understanding the relationship between reaction mechanisms and political discourse on RedditOrestis Papakyriakopoulos, Severin Engelmann, Amy A. WinecoffCHI 2023 · 27 citations
