PolicyKit: Building Governance in Online Communities
Amy X. Zhang, Grant Hugh, Michael S. Bernstein
Abstract
The software behind online community platforms encodes a governance model that represents a strikingly narrow set of governance possibilities focused on moderators and administrators. When online communities desire other forms of government, such as ones that take many members? opinions into account or that distribute power in non-trivial ways, communities must resort to laborious manual effort. In this paper, we present PolicyKit, a software infrastructure that empowers online community members to concisely author a wide range of governance procedures and automatically carry out those procedures on their home platforms. We draw on political science theory to encode community governance into policies, or short imperative functions that specify a procedure for determining whether a user-initiated action can execute. Actions that can be governed by policies encompass everyday activities such as posting or moderating a message, but actions can also encompass changes to the policies themselves, enabling the evolution of governance over time. We demonstrate the expressivity of PolicyKit through implementations of governance models such as a random jury deliberation, a multi-stage caucus, a reputation system, and a promotion procedure inspired by Wikipedia's Request for Adminship (RfA) process.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 22e89959-6c47-4049-8619-97af24b7bdb0Cited by top-tier papers39
- Jury Learning: Integrating Dissenting Voices into Machine Learning ModelsMitchell L. Gordon, Michelle S. Lam, Joon Sung Park, Kayur Patel et al.CHI 2022 · 134 citations
- Yes: Affirmative Consent as a Theoretical Framework for Understanding and Imagining Social PlatformsJane Im, Jill Dimond, Melody Berton, Una Lee et al.CHI 2021 · 100 citations
- Comparing the Perceived Legitimacy of Content Moderation Processes: Contractors, Algorithms, Expert Panels, and Digital JuriesChristina A. Pan, Sahil Yakhmi, Tara P. Iyer, Evan Strasnick et al.CSCW 2022 · 68 citations
- Exploring the Use of Personalized AI for Identifying Misinformation on Social MediaFarnaz Jahanbakhsh, Yannis Katsis, Dakuo Wang, Lucian Popa et al.CHI 2023 · 42 citations
- Leveraging Structured Trusted-Peer Assessments to Combat MisinformationFarnaz Jahanbakhsh, Amy X. Zhang, David R. KargerCSCW 2022 · 41 citations
Builds on3
- Digital Juries: A Civics-Oriented Approach to Platform GovernanceJenny Fan, Amy X. ZhangCHI 2020 · 90 citations
- Herding a Deluge of Good Samaritans: How GitHub Projects Respond to Increased AttentionDanaja Maldeniya, Ceren Budak, Lionel P. Robert Jr., Daniel M. RomeroWWW 2020 · 24 citations
- ScrAPIr: Making Web Data APIs Accessible to End UsersTarfah Alrashed, Jumana Almahmoud, Amy X. Zhang, David R. KargerCHI 2020 · 16 citations
Related papers
- Pika: Empowering Non-Programmers to Author Executable Governance Policies in Online CommunitiesLeijie Wang, Nicholas Vincent, Julija Rukanskaite, Amy Xian ZhangCHI 2024 · 9 citations
- Modular Politics: Toward a Governance Layer for Online CommunitiesNathan Schneider, Primavera De Filippi, Seth Frey, Joshua Z. Tan et al.CSCW 2021 · 63 citations
- Private Hierarchical Governance for Encrypted MessagingArmin Namavari, Barry Wang, Sanketh Menda, Ben Nassi et al.S&P 2024 · 1 citation
- PolicyCraft: Supporting Collaborative and Participatory Policy Design through Case-Grounded DeliberationTzu-Sheng Kuo, Quan Ze Chen, Amy X. Zhang, Jane Hsieh et al.CHI 2025 · 26 citations
- Governing Online Goods: Maturity and Formalization in Minecraft, Reddit, and World of Warcraft CommunitiesSeth Frey, Qiankun Zhong, Beril Bulat, William D. Weisman et al.CSCW 2022 · 17 citations
