Active Reward Modeling: Adaptive Preference Labeling for Large Language Model Alignment
Yunyi Shen, Hao Sun, Jean-Francois Ton
Abstract
Building neural reward models from human preferences is a pivotal component in reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) and large language model alignment research. Given the scarcity and high cost of human annotation, how to select the most informative pairs to annotate is an essential yet challenging open problem. In this work, we highlight the insight that an ideal comparison dataset for reward modeling should balance exploration of the representation space and make informative comparisons between pairs with moderate reward differences. Technically, challenges arise in quantifying the two objectives and efficiently prioritizing the comparisons to be annotated. To address this, we propose the Fisher information-based selection strategies, adapt theories from the classical experimental design literature, and apply them to the final linear layer of the deep neural network-based reward modeling tasks. Empirically, our method demonstrates remarkable performance, high computational efficiency, and stability compared to other selection methods from deep learning and classical statistical literature across multiple opensource LLMs and datasets. Further ablation studies reveal that incorporating cross-prompt comparisons in active reward modeling significantly enhances labeling efficiency, shedding light on the potential for improved annotation strategies in RLHF. Code and embeddings to reproduce all results of this paper are available at https: //github.com/YunyiShen/ARM-FI/ .
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext a628df20-73a5-4b4c-9e86-8df734a18b20Cited by top-tier papers4
- Towards Understanding Valuable Preference Data for Large Language Model AlignmentZizhuo Zhang, Qizhou Wang, Shanshan Ye, Jianing Zhu et al.ICLR 2026 · 6 citations
- CoAct: Co-Active LLM Preference Learning with Human-AI SynergyRuiyao Xu, Mihir Parmar, Tiankai Yang, Zhengyu Hu et al.ACL 2026 · 1 citation
- What Does Preference Learning Recover from Pairwise Comparison Data?Rattana Pukdee, Nina Balcan, Pradeep RavikumarICML 2026 · 1 citation
- When Distance Distracts: Representation Distance Bias in BT-Loss for Reward ModelsTong Xie, Ching-Yuan Bai, Yuanhao Ban, Yunqi Hong et al.ICML 2026
Builds on11
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- Scaling Laws for Reward Model OveroptimizationLeo Gao, John Schulman, Jacob HiltonICML 2023 · 963 citations
- Statistical Rejection Sampling Improves Preference OptimizationTianqi Liu, Yao Zhao, Rishabh Joshi, Misha Khalman et al.ICLR 2024 · 346 citations
- Reward Model Ensembles Help Mitigate OveroptimizationThomas Coste, Usman Anwar, Robert Kirk, David KruegerICLR 2024 · 208 citations
- Rewards-in-Context: Multi-objective Alignment of Foundation Models with Dynamic Preference AdjustmentRui Yang, Xiaoman Pan, Feng Luo, Shuang Qiu et al.ICML 2024 · 144 citations
Related papers
- RLTHF: Targeted Human Feedback for LLM AlignmentYifei Xu, Tusher Chakraborty, Emre Kiciman, Bibek Aryal et al.ICML 2025
- Avoiding exp(R) scaling in RLHF through Preference-based ExplorationMingyu Chen, Yiding Chen, Wen Sun, Xuezhou ZhangNeurIPS 2025 · 9 citations
- Unbiased Reward Modeling from Implicit Feedback for LLM AlignmentHao Wang, Haocheng Yang, Licheng Pan, Zhichao Chen et al.ICML 2026 · 2 citations
- ActiveDPO: Active Direct Preference Optimization for Sample-Efficient AlignmentXiaoqiang Lin, Arun Verma, Zhongxiang Dai, Daniela Rus et al.ICLR 2026 · 12 citations
- Influence-based Online Experience Selection for Effective RLHFYifan Gong, Jing Yao, Xiting Wang, Xunlong Wang et al.ACL 2026
