RLTHF: Targeted Human Feedback for LLM Alignment
Yifei Xu, Tusher Chakraborty, Emre Kiciman, Bibek Aryal, Srinagesh Sharma, Songwu Lu, Ranveer Chandra
Abstract
Fine-tuning large language models (LLMs) to align with user preferences is challenging due to the high cost of quality human annotations in Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) and the generalizability limitations of AI Feedback. To address these challenges, we propose RLTHF, a human-AI hybrid framework that combines LLM-based initial alignment with selective human annotations to achieve full-human annotation alignment with minimal effort. RLTHF identifies hard-to-annotate samples mislabeled by LLMs using a reward model's reward distribution and iteratively enhances alignment by integrating strategic human corrections while leveraging LLM's correctly labeled samples. Evaluations on HH-RLHF and TL;DR datasets show that RLTHF reaches full-human annotation-level alignment with only 6-7% of the human annotation effort. Furthermore, models trained on RLTHF's curated datasets for downstream tasks outperform those trained on fully human-annotated datasets, underscoring the effectiveness of RLTHF.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext ae056b3a-d9e1-463b-871d-e0c101943a59Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on16
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward ModelRafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D. Manning et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 10,924 citations
- Finetuned Language Models are Zero-Shot LearnersJason Wei, Maarten Bosma, Vincent Y. Zhao, Kelvin Guu et al.ICLR 2022 · 4,966 citations
- Model Alignment as Prospect Theoretic OptimizationKawin Ethayarajh, Winnie Xu, Niklas Muennighoff, Dan Jurafsky et al.ICML 2024 · 973 citations
- LLM Evaluators Recognize and Favor Their Own GenerationsArjun Panickssery, Samuel R. Bowman, Shi FengNeurIPS 2024 · 865 citations
Related papers
- RLAIF vs. RLHF: Scaling Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback with AI FeedbackHarrison Lee, Samrat Phatale, Hassan Mansoor, Thomas Mesnard et al.ICML 2024 · 598 citations
- Prototypical Reward Network for Data-Efficient RLHFJinghan Zhang, Xiting Wang, Yiqiao Jin, Changyu Chen et al.ACL 2024
- trlX: A Framework for Large Scale Reinforcement Learning from Human FeedbackAlexander Havrilla, Maksym Zhuravinskyi, Duy Phung, Aman Tiwari et al.EMNLP 2023 · 11 citations
- RED: Unleashing Token-Level Rewards from Holistic Feedback via Reward RedistributionJiahui Li, Lin Li, Tai-Wei Chang, Kun Kuang et al.EMNLP 2025
- Active Reward Modeling: Adaptive Preference Labeling for Large Language Model AlignmentYunyi Shen, Hao Sun, Jean-Francois TonICML 2025
