ACL Findings2025
Reward Generalization in RLHF: A Topological Perspective
Tianyi Alex Qiu, Fanzhi Zeng, Jiaming Ji, Dong Yan, Kaile Wang, Jiayi Zhou, Yang Han, Josef Dai, Xuehai Pan, Yaodong Yang
Abstract
Existing alignment methods share a common topology of information flow, where reward information is collected from humans, modeled with preference learning, and used to tune language models. However, this shared topology has not been systematically characterized, nor have its alternatives been thoroughly explored, leaving the problems of low data efficiency and unreliable generalization unaddressed. As a solution, we introduce a theory of reward generalization in reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF), focusing on the topology of information flow at both macro and micro levels. At the macro level, we portray the RLHF information flow as an autoencoding process over behavior distributions, formalizing the RLHF objective of distributional consistency between human preference and model behavior. At the micro level, we present induced Bayesian networks to model the impact of dataset topologies on reward generalization. Combining analysis on both levels, we propose reward modeling from tree-structured preference information. It is shown to reduce reward uncertainty by up to Θ(log n/ log log n) times compared to baselines, where n is the dataset size. Validation on three NLP tasks shows that it achieves an average win rate of 65% against baselines, thus improving reward generalization for free via topology design, while reducing the amount of data requiring annotation.
Ask Lune
Ask anything. The answer quotes the paper.
Lune reads all of it and the papers around it, then shows you the passages behind every answer.
Lune answers from
the full paper · 4 top-tier papers that cite it · related work
Free to start. No credit card required.
Cited by top-tier papers4
- Why is Your Language Model a Poor Implicit Reward Model?Noam Razin, Yong Lin, Jiarui Yao, Sanjeev AroraICLR 2026 · 8 citations
- Probing Preference Representations: A Multi-Dimensional Evaluation and Analysis Method for Reward ModelsChenglong Wang, Yifu Huo, Yang Gan, Yongyu Mu et al.AAAI 2026 · 1 citation
- Quantifying Large Language Model Attacks Through the Lens of Model CognitionXiuming Liu, Chaoxiang He, Xuanran Yu, Jichen Chai et al.USENIX Security 2026
- Learn from Your Mistakes: Tree-like Self-Play for Secure Code LLMsWenqi Chen, Ziyan Zhang, Bin Wang, Lin Liu et al.ICML 2026
Builds on16
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward ModelRafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D. Manning et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 10,924 citations
- Tree of Thoughts: Deliberate Problem Solving with Large Language ModelsShunyu Yao, Dian Yu, Jeffrey Zhao, Izhak Shafran et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 5,068 citations
- Let's Verify Step by StepHunter Lightman, Vineet Kosaraju, Yuri Burda, Harrison Edwards et al.ICLR 2024 · 3,045 citations
- Scaling Laws for Reward Model OveroptimizationLeo Gao, John Schulman, Jacob HiltonICML 2023 · 963 citations
Related papers
- On the Limited Generalization Capability of the Implicit Reward Model Induced by Direct Preference OptimizationYong Lin, Skyler Seto, Maartje ter Hoeve, Katherine Metcalf et al.EMNLP Findings 2024 · 1 citation
- COMAL: A Convergent Meta-Algorithm for Aligning LLMs with General PreferencesYixin Liu, Argyris Oikonomou, Weiqiang Zheng, Yang Cai et al.ICLR 2026 · 5 citations
- Regularizing Hidden States Enables Learning Generalizable Reward Model for LLMsRui Yang, Ruomeng Ding, Yong Lin, Huan Zhang et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 157 citations
- Reward Modeling Requires Automatic Adjustment Based on Data QualityBinghai Wang, Rui Zheng, Lu Chen, Zhiheng Xi et al.EMNLP Findings 2024 · 2 citations
- On a Connection Between Imitation Learning and RLHFTeng Xiao, Yige Yuan, Mingxiao Li, Zhengyu Chen et al.ICLR 2025
