Avoiding exp(R) scaling in RLHF through Preference-based Exploration
Mingyu Chen, Yiding Chen, Wen Sun, Xuezhou Zhang
Abstract
Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) has emerged as a pivotal technique for large language model (LLM) alignment. This paper studies the setting of online RLHF and focus on improving sample efficiency. All existing algorithms in online RLHF, whether doing passive exploration or active exploration, suffer from a sample complexity that scales exponentially with the scale of the reward function. This fundamental limitation hinders their effectiveness in scenarios with heavily skewed preferences, e.g. questions with a unique correct solution. To address this, we introduce Self-Exploring Preference-Incentive Online Preference Optimization (SE-POPO), an online RLHF algorithm that for the first time achieves a sample complexity that scales polynomially with the reward scale, answering an open problem raised by Xie et al. (2024).. Theoretically, we demonstrate that the sample complexity of SE-POPO dominates that of existing exploration algorithms. Empirically, our systematic evaluation confirms that SE-POPO is more sample-efficient than both exploratory and non-exploratory baselines, in two primary application scenarios of RLHF as well as on public benchmarks, marking a significant step forward in RLHF algorithm design. The code is available at https://github.com/MYC000801/SE-POPO.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext 8e84f1c7-0b96-4230-aa00-ddc33538bacdCited by top-tier papers2
- Preference-based Reinforcement Learning beyond Pairwise Comparisons: Benefits of Multiple OptionsJoongkyu Lee, Seouh-won Yi, Min-hwan OhNeurIPS 2025 · 3 citations
- Online Compatible Reward Identification from Preference FeedbackSimone Drago, Marco Mussi, Alberto Maria MetelliICML 2026
Builds on23
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- Measuring Massive Multitask Language UnderstandingDan Hendrycks, Collin Burns, Steven Basart, Andy Zou et al.ICLR 2021 · 7,905 citations
- TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human FalsehoodsStephanie Lin, Jacob Hilton, Owain EvansACL 2022 · 3,228 citations
- WinoGrande: An Adversarial Winograd Schema Challenge at ScaleKeisuke Sakaguchi, Ronan Le Bras, Chandra Bhagavatula, Yejin ChoiAAAI 2020 · 3,037 citations
- AlpacaFarm: A Simulation Framework for Methods that Learn from Human FeedbackYann Dubois, Chen Xuechen Li, Rohan Taori, Tianyi Zhang et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 948 citations
Related papers
- Exploratory Preference Optimization: Harnessing Implicit Q*-Approximation for Sample-Efficient RLHFTengyang Xie, Dylan J. Foster, Akshay Krishnamurthy, Corby Rosset et al.ICLR 2025
- Online Preference Alignment for Language Models via Count-based ExplorationChenjia Bai, Yang Zhang, Shuang Qiu, Qiaosheng Zhang et al.ICLR 2025
- Influence-based Online Experience Selection for Effective RLHFYifan Gong, Jing Yao, Xiting Wang, Xunlong Wang et al.ACL 2026
- IPO: Your Language Model is Secretly a Preference ClassifierShivank Garg, Ayush Singh, Shweta Singh, Paras ChopraACL 2025
- Iterative Preference Learning from Human Feedback: Bridging Theory and Practice for RLHF under KL-constraintWei Xiong, Hanze Dong, Chenlu Ye, Ziqi Wang et al.ICML 2024 · 346 citations
