V-PROM: A Benchmark for Visual Reasoning Using Visual Progressive Matrices
Damien Teney, Peng Wang, Jiewei Cao, Lingqiao Liu, Chunhua Shen, Anton van den Hengel
Abstract
Advances in machine learning have generated increasing enthusiasm for tasks that require high-level reasoning on top of perceptual capabilities, particularly over visual data. Such tasks include, for example, image captioning, visual question answering, and visual navigation. Their evaluation is however hindered by task-specific confounding factors and dataset biases. In parallel, the existing benchmarks for abstract reasoning are limited to synthetic stimuli (e.g. images of simple shapes) and do not capture the challenges of real-world data. We propose a new large-scale benchmark to evaluates abstract reasoning over real visual data. The test involves visual questions that require operations fundamental to many high-level vision tasks, such as comparisons of counts and logical operations on complex visual properties. The benchmark measures a method's ability to infer high-level relationships and to generalise them over image-based concepts. We provide multiple training/test splits that require controlled levels of generalization. We evaluate a range of deep learning architectures, and find that existing models, including those popular for vision-and-language tasks, are unable to solve seemingly-simple instances. Models using relational networks fare better but leave substantial room for improvement.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext a3bfd33c-1a43-4f7f-bece-c21143926996Cited by top-tier papers13
- Bongard-LOGO: A New Benchmark for Human-Level Concept Learning and ReasoningWeili Nie, Zhiding Yu, Lei Mao, Ankit B. Patel et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 107 citations
- Bongard-HOI: Benchmarking Few-Shot Visual Reasoning for Human-Object InteractionsHuaizu Jiang, Xiaojian Ma, Weili Nie, Zhiding Yu et al.CVPR 2022 · 22 citations
- Hierarchical ConViT with Attention-Based Relational Reasoner for Visual Analogical ReasoningWentao He, Jialu Zhang, Jianfeng Ren, Ruibin Bai et al.AAAI 2023 · 22 citations
- RelViT: Concept-guided Vision Transformer for Visual Relational ReasoningXiaojian Ma, Weili Nie, Zhiding Yu, Huaizu Jiang et al.ICLR 2022 · 21 citations
- Bongard-OpenWorld: Few-Shot Reasoning for Free-form Visual Concepts in the Real WorldRujie Wu, Xiaojian Ma, Zhenliang Zhang, Wei Wang et al.ICLR 2024 · 20 citations
Related papers
- VisRes Bench: On Evaluating the Visual Reasoning Capabilities of VLMsBrigitta Malagurski Törtei, Yasser Dahou, Ngoc Dung Huynh, Wamiq Reyaz Para et al.CVPR 2026 · 3 citations
- VisuLogic: A Benchmark for Evaluating Visual Reasoning in Multi-modal Large Language ModelsWeiye Xu, Jiahao Wang, Weiyun Wang, Zhe Chen et al.ICLR 2026 · 103 citations
- Scale-Localized Abstract ReasoningYaniv Benny, Niv Pekar, Lior WolfCVPR 2021
- SpatiaLab: Can Vision-Language Models Perform Spatial Reasoning in the Wild?Azmine Toushik Wasi, Wahid Faisal, Abdur Rahman, Mahfuz Ahmed Anik et al.ICLR 2026 · 13 citations
- SpatiaLQA: A Benchmark for Evaluating Spatial Logical Reasoning in Vision-Language ModelsYuechen Xie, Xiaoyan Zhang, Yicheng Shan, Zhu Hao et al.CVPR 2026 · 8 citations
