Bongard-LOGO: A New Benchmark for Human-Level Concept Learning and Reasoning
Weili Nie, Zhiding Yu, Lei Mao, Ankit B. Patel, Yuke Zhu, Anima Anandkumar
Abstract
Humans have an inherent ability to learn novel concepts from only a few samples and generalize these concepts to different situations. Even though today's machine learning models excel with a plethora of training data on standard recognition tasks, a considerable gap exists between machine-level pattern recognition and human-level concept learning. To narrow this gap, the Bongard Problems (BPs) were introduced as an inspirational challenge for visual cognition in intelligent systems. Despite new advances in representation learning and learning to learn, BPs remain a daunting challenge for modern AI. Inspired by the original one hundred BPs, we propose a new benchmark Bongard-LOGO for human-level concept learning and reasoning. We develop a program-guided generation technique to produce a large set of human-interpretable visual cognition problems in action-oriented LOGO language. Our benchmark captures three core properties of human cognition: 1) context-dependent perception, in which the same object may have disparate interpretations given different contexts; 2) analogy-making perception, in which some meaningful concepts are traded off for other meaningful concepts; and 3) perception with a few samples but infinite vocabulary. In experiments, we show that the state-of-the-art deep learning methods perform substantially worse than human subjects, implying that they fail to capture core human cognition properties. Finally, we discuss research directions towards a general architecture for visual reasoning to tackle this benchmark.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers21
- Test-Time Prompt Tuning for Zero-Shot Generalization in Vision-Language ModelsManli Shu, Weili Nie, De-An Huang, Zhiding Yu et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 603 citations
- MEWL: Few-shot multimodal word learning with referential uncertaintyGuangyuan Jiang, Manjie Xu, Shiji Xin, Wei Liang et al.ICML 2023 · 29 citations
- Bongard-HOI: Benchmarking Few-Shot Visual Reasoning for Human-Object InteractionsHuaizu Jiang, Xiaojian Ma, Weili Nie, Zhiding Yu et al.CVPR 2022 · 22 citations
- Tracking Without Re-recognition in Humans and MachinesDrew Linsley, Girik Malik, Junkyung Kim, Lakshmi Narasimhan Govindarajan et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 21 citations
- RelViT: Concept-guided Vision Transformer for Visual Relational ReasoningXiaojian Ma, Weili Nie, Zhiding Yu, Huaizu Jiang et al.ICLR 2022 · 21 citations
Builds on4
- Rapid Learning or Feature Reuse? Towards Understanding the Effectiveness of MAMLAniruddh Raghu, Maithra Raghu, Samy Bengio, Oriol VinyalsICLR 2020 · 736 citations
- Meta-Dataset: A Dataset of Datasets for Learning to Learn from Few ExamplesEleni Triantafillou, Tyler Zhu, Vincent Dumoulin, Pascal Lamblin et al.ICLR 2020 · 692 citations
- V-PROM: A Benchmark for Visual Reasoning Using Visual Progressive MatricesDamien Teney, Peng Wang, Jiewei Cao, Lingqiao Liu et al.AAAI 2020 · 37 citations
- Momentum Contrast for Unsupervised Visual Representation LearningKaiming He, Haoqi Fan, Yuxin Wu, Saining Xie et al.CVPR 2020
Related papers
- Bongard-OpenWorld: Few-Shot Reasoning for Free-form Visual Concepts in the Real WorldRujie Wu, Xiaojian Ma, Zhenliang Zhang, Wei Wang et al.ICLR 2024 · 20 citations
- Reasoning Limitations of Multimodal Large Language Models. A case study of Bongard ProblemsMikolaj Malkinski, Szymon Pawlonka, Jacek MandziukICML 2025
- Bongard in Wonderland: Visual Puzzles that Still Make AI Go Mad?Antonia Wüst, Tim Nelson Tobiasch, Lukas Helff, Inga Ibs et al.ICML 2025
- Bongard-RWR+: Real-World Representations of Fine-Grained Concepts in Bongard ProblemsSzymon Pawlonka, Mikołaj Małkiński, Jacek MańdziukICLR 2026 · 7 citations
- Your Reasoning Benchmark May Not Test Reasoning: Revealing Perception Bottleneck in Abstract Reasoning BenchmarksXinhe Wang, Jin Huang, Xingjian Zhang, Tianhao Wang et al.ACL 2026 · 3 citations
